Because authoritarian and totalitarian systems allow their leaders to exert unlimited control over their citizens, they can do as they please and their subjects cannot do anything against their rule.
Answer:
1.Because it gives a direct relation that can be used to obtain the efficiency E = Input/output which tell us how the system works, for example, if the efficiency is bigger than one, this means that the system amplifies the input (the output is bigger than the input) while if the efficiency is less than one, the output
2.(a) EXAMPLE answers: Two inputs are doctors and nurses. Two outputs are better health and medicines. Two side effects are the cost of insurance payments and the cost of medicine
2.(b) sorry I don’t have a answer
3. Inputs that occur naturally include energy from the Sun and wind, energy from insects and other organisms, nutrients from the soil, and water from precipitation. Water is also an input provided by humans, as are nutrients from compost and manure.
4. System thinking is a way of understanding reality that emphasizes the relationships among a system's parts, rather than the parts themselves. System thinking is a process of discovery and exploration, an inquiry into the governing processes underlying the problems we face.
5. The relationship between side effects and system thinking is very simple. Side effects are very general consequences and system thinking is a process
Explanation:
I hope i helped the best I can, sry about 2.(b)
The correct answer is letter C
Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics that presents useful action as the best action, the right action.
The most common description of utilitarianism concerns the well-being of sentient beings, those who are capable of feeling pain and pleasure, in some cases even non-humans. This description is the reason why, in modern times, utilitarianism has been used in discussions about the suffering of non-human animals and ethical aspects involved in the production of animals for food purposes. For Bentham, utility is the aggregate of pleasures, after deducting the suffering of everyone involved in an action, a kind of liquid pleasure, which would be the basis for happiness. Stuart Mill, on the other hand, had a broader concept, focusing his efforts on rules rather than individual moral actions. In this concept, Mill included not only quantity, but the quality of pleasure, which contributed to the sophistication of the debate. Some authors, on the other hand, tried to develop the so-called negative utilitarianism, which denies the positive value of pleasure, trying to define the utility in terms of suffering, in this way, the most useful would be the one that causes the least suffering. Other variations, such as those by Henry Sidgwick, R. M. Hare and Peter Singer, include satisfaction of preferences and even more ingrained moral values in the concept of utility.
He is trying to warn you to tell you someone is here. There are also telling you they will be ready for whoever enters your home.
