1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serjik [45]
2 years ago
6

I need help I do not understand this it's due tomorrow

Mathematics
1 answer:
Goshia [24]2 years ago
8 0
I'll help you out with 3 questions.
For #1, you kind of figured it out yourself
That 90 degree angle on paper means that m/1 and m/2 make up 90
If m1 is 50, then just subtract m1 (50) from 90, making it 40. m/2 is 40

If Angle M4 is 45 degrees then angle M3 is 180-45 since they both make up a 180 degree angle.

There are 180 degrees in a triangle
If m 8 = 78
and m 9 = 60 
m 10 is 180 - 78 - 60


You might be interested in
Equation through the point (5,9) with a slope of -4
hoa [83]
The answer is: y=-4x+29

To solve this, you need to know the y-intercept. 
1. y=-4x+b
2. 9+-4(5)+b
3. 9=-20+b
4. b=9+20
5. b=29
6. Substitute into y=-4x+b

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
6) What are ED and FD?
kolezko [41]

Answer:

ED = 12 and FD = 24

Step-by-step explanation:

See the attached diagram.

The perpendicular distance between the three parallel lines are same i.e. AB = BC = 8

Therefore, the parallel lines will divide any transverse line ( say FD ) in 1 : 1 ratio i.e. will divide equally.

Therefore, FE = ED = 12 units.

Again, FD = FE + ED = 12 + 12 = 24 units. (Answer)

5 0
3 years ago
What is the value of the x variable in the solution to the following system of equations?
harkovskaia [24]
Its A. x=4

procedure: 3*equation1 - 2*equation2 ⇒ x=4
8 0
3 years ago
1) What is the first x in x + 3x = 16?
Lyrx [107]
1. x=22/5
2. x=4
3. x=4
5 0
2 years ago
A coin is biased such that it results in 2 heads out of every 3 coins flips on average
alina1380 [7]

<span>The mathematical theory of probability assumes that we have a well defined repeatable (in principle) experiment, which has as its outcome a set of well defined, mutually exclusive, events.</span>


If we assume that each individual coin is equally likely to come up heads or tails, then each of the above 16 outcomes to 4 flips is equally likely. Each occurs a fraction one out of 16 times, or each has a probability of 1/16.

Alternatively, we could argue that the 1st coin has probability 1/2 to come up heads or tails, the 2nd coin has probability 1/2 to come up heads or tails, and so on for the 3rd and 4th coins, so that the probability for any one particular sequence of heads and tails is just (1/2)x(1/2)x(1/2)x(1/2)=(1/16).

Now lets ask: what is the probability that in 4 flips, one gets N heads, where N=0, 1, 2, 3, or 4. We can get this just by counting the number of outcomes above which have the desired number of heads, and dividing by the total number of possible outcomes, 16. 
  
 

<span>N     # outcomes with N heads     probability to get N heads</span>

0                1                                       1/16 = 0.0625

1                4                                       4/16 = 1/4 = 0.25

2                6                                      6/16 = 3/8 = 0.375

3                4                                      4/16 = 1/4 = 0.25

4                1                                      1/16 = 0.0625

We can plot these results on a graph as shown below.

 
The dashed line is shown just as a guide to the eye. Notice that the curve has a "bell" shape. The most likely outcome is for N=2 heads, where the curve reaches its maximum value. This is just what you would expect: if each coin is equally likely to land heads as tails, in four flips, half should come up heads, that is N = 4x(1/2) = 2 is the most likely outcome. Note however that an occurrence of N = 1 or N = 3 is not so unlikely - they occur 1/4 or 25% of the time. To have an occurrence of only N = 0, or N = 4 (no heads, or all heads) is much less likely - they occur only 1/16 or 6.25% of the time.

The above procedure is in principle the way to solve all problems in probability. Define the experiment, enumerate all possible mutually exclusive outcomes (which are usually assumed to be each equally likely), and then count the number of these outcomes which have the particular property being tested for (here for example, the number of heads). Dividing this number by the total number of possible outcomes then gives the probability of the system to have that particular property.

Often, however, the number of possible outcomes may be so large that an explicit enumeration would become very tedious. In such cases, one can resort to more subtle thinking to arrive at the desired probabilities. For example, we can deduce the probabilities to get N heads in 4 flips as follows:

N=0: There is only one possible outcome that gives 0 heads, namely when each flip results in a tail. The probability is therefore 1/16.

N=4: There is only one possible outcome that gives 4 heads, namely when each flip results in a head. The probability is therefore 1/16.

N=1: There are 4 possible outcomes which will have only one coin heads. It may be that the 1st coin is heads, and all others are tails; or it may be that the 2nd coin is heads, and all others are tails; or it may be that the 3rd (or the 4th) coin is heads, and all others are tails. Since there are 4 possible outcomes with one head only, the probability is 4/16 = 1/4.

N=3: To get 3 heads, means that one gets only one tail. This tail can be either the 1st coin, the 2nd coin, the 3rd, or the 4th coin. Thus there are only 4 outcomes which have three heads. The probability is 4/16 = 1/4.

N=2: To enumerate directly all the possible outcomes which have exactly 2 heads only, is a bit trickier than the other cases. We will come to it shortly. But we can get the desired probability for N=2 the following way: We have already enumerated all possible outcomes with either N = 0, 1, 3, or 4 heads. These account for 1 + 4 + 4 + 1 = 10 possible outcomes. The only outcomes not include in these 10 are those with exactly N=2 heads. Since there are 16 possible outcomes, and 10 do not have N=2 heads, there must therefore be exactly 16 - 10 = 6 outcomes which do have exactly N=2 heads. The probability for N=2 is therefore 6/16 = 3/8.

2) Consider the experiment of rolling 3 dice, each of which has 6 sides.

What is the probability that no two dice land with the same number side up, i.e. each of the three dice rolls a different number?

Since each die has 6 possible outcomes, the number of possible outcomes for the roll of three dice is 6x6x6 = 216. We could enumerate all these 216 possibilities, and then count the number of outcomes in which each die has a different number. This is clearly too tedious! Instead we reason as follows:


6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • N • 10 = 38
    14·1 answer
  • Predict in 40 spins many<br> times you would spin a number<br> divisible by 3
    15·1 answer
  • What is 300 divided by 7
    6·2 answers
  • What part of 29 is 36?
    8·1 answer
  • Usually Jim walks at a speed of 5 miles/h and Jerry walks at a speed of 6 miles/h. If Jerry walked for 3 hours to climb a hill,
    10·1 answer
  • ASAP
    15·1 answer
  • Does anyone know what happened to the tutors??
    5·1 answer
  • What expression best estimates -18 1/4 ÷ 2 2/3<br>a. 18÷3<br>b. -18÷3<br>c. -18÷(-3)<br>d. 18÷(-3)​
    12·1 answer
  • A side of the triangle below has been extended to form an exterior angle of 132°. Find
    7·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP! What is the smallest positive number that can be added to 55 so that the resulting number and 45 have 9 as their grea
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!