This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is the following:
A novel’s main character, Jefferson, refuses to speak to his sister because she hurt his feelings when she lied to him. What kind of conflict is driving Jefferson’s actions?
A. character vs. nature
B. character vs. society
C. character vs. self
D. character vs. character
Answer:
The kind of conflict driving Jefferson's actions is:
D. character vs. character
Explanation:
<u>A conflict is a struggle between two opposing forces.</u> In literature, there are some common types of conflict, such as character vs. self, character vs. society, or character vs. nature. Conflicts can also be external (caused by an outside force) or internal (taking place in the character's mind).
<u>According to the instructions in the question, the kind of conflict described is character vs. character, that is, Jefferson vs. his sister. The two characters are the opposing forces in this case. Their struggle was caused by the sister lying to Jefferson, which led him to refuse to speak to her.</u>
Answer:
The oxymoron creates a contradictory mood, emphasizing the confused nature of love.
Explanation:
The oxymoron is a figure of speech that allows to present a paradox in the text, that is, the oxymoron presents in the same sentence, two contrary information, but that are complemented in some way.
In the text presented above, the oxymoron is seen in the lines "the sweetest honey / Is loathsome in his own deliciousness". With this sentence, the author creates a contradictory mood, but presents a characteristic love as something confused, but pleasurable.
Answer:
1.)The fact that even though their love was forbidden they still found a way to be with each other. That stuck out to me because no matter what was in their way the love they had for each other was always stronger than what they had to overcome
2.) Instead of talking to each other to figure things out they both ended up dying due to lack of communication. That stuck out to me because the ending couldve have been so different if they had talked things out before they acted on them.
3.) Romeo and juliet risked everything their families, lovers, friends. They had no problem throwing those things away for each other their commitment to each other was so strong. That stuck out to me because now adays not everyone is willing to drop everything for the one person they love.
Explanation: rewrite it however u want or choose completely different ones its up to u :)
<span>A. cultural diversity and its interaction with outsiders.</span>
In the context of symbolic interactionism, it the study of human conduct and human life. How one’s social life is formed and is being described by one’s perspective of self and others –community, society and etc. In this approach, these 3 views were asserted by Herbert Blumer (1969) as follows:
<span><span>1. </span>People act on a specific object based on how they see or construe it according to their outlook and attribution on the object.</span> <span><span>
2. </span>These certain outlooks and attribution that has been formed by an individual is shaped and reinforced by the people this individual is exposed to.</span> <span><span>
3. </span>These outlooks and attribution are continuously changed and altered based on one’s social environment.<span>
</span></span>
<span>The answer is D. Ideas follow a logical order and connect to each other clearly. When referring to coherency, the article must have a good flow to make it easier for the readers to understand. Ideas must be interconnected and well-placed.</span><span />
