Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
He made the treaty of Moscow.
Answer:
Status
Explanation:
Sociologist defines status as a position of an individual occupies in a particular context. Generally speaking, there are two types of status that are achieved status and ascribed status. While ascribed status is the status which is not earned but people born with it like sex, race, etc, on the other hand, achieved status refers to the status acquired by an individual through personal abilities and skills.
Answer:
Explanation:
रेसलाई "मानवजातिको कोटी को रूपमा परिभाषित गरीन्छ जुन केहि विशिष्ट शारीरिक लक्षणहरू साझेदारी गर्दछ।" जातजाति शब्दलाई अझ व्यापक रूपमा परिभाषित गरिएको छ "साधारण जातीय, राष्ट्रिय, आदिवासी, धार्मिक, भाषिक, वा सांस्कृतिक मूल वा पृष्ठभूमि अनुसार मानिसहरुको ठूलो समूह hope this helps
