I believe the answer is: <span>She made friends with the creature by throwing him a red rubber ball.
Despite its scary features, Cerberus is basically a pet dog that is told to guard the gate. (even though the gate that it protects is the gate of hell rather than the gate of normal household).
So annabeth instinctively think that Cerberus must be bored since He got no friend and attention in that place and play fetch with the ball that </span><span>she stole from the Waterworld gift store.</span>
Answer:
Debra Medina claimed that nullification was possible by state laws that could neutralize federal laws. She based her claim on the 10th Amendment, which establishes that any power not constitutionally granted to the federal government can be held by the states.
Explanation:
The Constitution doesn´t enable the nullification of federal laws by the states, and several academics have stated that it could be illegal since the Supremacy Clause pronounces federal laws as the supreme national law. So nullification would overthrow the constitutional interpretation held for 200 years.
Let us also remember that Gov. Rick Perry, who supported nullification, had already skipped the nullification issue by starting a debate about secession. This debate is a reminder of the time when state rejection of racial integration had to be stopped by the Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.
Answer:
Confirmation Bias
Explanation:
Confirmation bias is a deep seated tendency to prefer information that confirms our existing positions. The human understanding when it has once adopted an opinion draws all things else to support and agree with it. And though there is a greater number and weight of instances to be found not true, he either neglects, despises or rejects in order that by this great and pernicious determination the authority of its conclusions may remain inviolate. Confirmation bias is found to be important because it may lead people to hold strongly to false beliefs or give more weight to information that supports their beliefs than is warranted by evidences. This biased approach is largely unintentional and often results in ignoring inconsistent information
This is a well known psychological tendency
The answer would be majority opinion,
Hopefully that helps you ❤.
