Sentences could be simple, compound, complex, and compound-complex. The type of sentence that is representative of the sentence above is;
A compound-complex sentence is one that has two independent clauses and one dependent clause.
Note that independent clauses are groups of words that can make complete meaning on their own while dependent clauses are the opposite.
In the sentence given, the independent clauses are;
- At the beginning of the Revolutionary War, the Americans had no existing army.
- So American troops were formed from militia.
The dependent clause is;
- Groups of citizens from the thirteen colonies who were trained for local defense.
Therefore the sentence is compound-complex.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/12426553
It is to be noted that all the qualities of a summary of a fictional text are:
- Theme with details from the text (Option B)
- Brief description of the characters and plot (Option C)
- A list of examples of figurative language used (Option D).
<h3>What is a summary?</h3>
A Summary is a concise description of the content of a text highlighting the key details from same.
Hence it is correct to state that the qualities of a summary of a fictional text are:
- Theme with details from the text
- Brief description of the characters and plot
- A list of examples of figurative language used.
Learn more about summaries at:
brainly.com/question/25605883
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
On March 4th, when Charlie took the Rorschach Test, he was supposed to view the images of the inkblots and freely imagine what he saw in them. But Charlie only saw the inkblots for what they were: blobs of ink. Even when Burt tells him to imagine, to pretend, to look for something there in the card, Charlie can't. He struggles to give a true description of the cards, pointing out how one was "a very nice pictur of ink with pritty points all around the eges," but again, this isn't the response that the psychologist is looking for.
Like ambiguously shaped clouds in which people "see" images of people and animals, the inkblots have enough random, busy shapes on them for people to interpret them as many different things--people, animals, scenes, conflicts, and so on. The idea is that the psychologist will pay attention to what a person thinks he or she sees in the inkblots, which is supposed to provide insight on what that person thinks and feels overall.
As a result of Charlie's inability to properly take this test, he worries that he's failed and that he won't be a candidate for the treatment to increase his intelligence. And while he gets frustrated with himself during the test, and while Burt seems to get almost angry--as evinced when his pencil point breaks--I wouldn't say that Charlie is angry in this situation.
But what this scene does reveal about his character is that perhaps he's already smarter than we expect. By insisting on seeing the inkblots for what they really are, and by failing to imagine scenes and images that are false or skewed, Charlie shows that he's not just honest but scrupulous. This early evidence of his good character foreshadows the upcoming conflicts he has with the men at the bakery as well as the researchers themselves, who are less scrupulous.