<u>Answer:</u>
<em>These passages differ in their ideas about the Magnusson fishery and conservation act in the sense that the first author warns that the act is insufficient, while the second author argues that it may be too strict. (D)</em>
<em />
<u>Explanation:</u>
Both the authors have given different perspectives and shared distinct opinions on the Magnusson act. There are different facts and figures which have been put forward by both the writers supporting respective opinions. The later considers this act and its regulations may affect fisheries and its overall supply while the former considers this act as an insufficient one.
Answer:
C). Next to the noun it describes.
Explanation:
<u>A misplaced modifier is described as the formatting or structural error in which a word or clause is separated or isolated from the noun or pronoun it intends to describe/modify and rather describe an inadvertent word</u> that creates an ambiguous and misleading effect in the sentence.
Thus, such formatting error creates confusion due to the incorrect placement of the participial phrase(that functions to modify a noun or pronoun in the sentence). Therefore, in order to rectify this error of misplaced modifier and avoid such confusion, the participial phrase must be placed 'next to the noun it describes' so that it clarifies which noun or pronoun is being modified by the participial phrase in the sentence. Hence, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
<span>D.Yes, he states: “While, then, every part of our country thus feels an immediate and particular interest in union, all the parts combined cannot fail to find in the united mass of means and efforts greater strength. . .”
From the statement above, we could only infer that the statement is just an opinion. Evidence should have some sort of hard data, either it's a quantitative or qualitative data.</span>
I’m sorry, I’m not sure what you’re asking. If you need help, let me know.
