The answer would be Skype
The answer is d it is d it is d I think I think, I’m not sure though
The distinction between "computer architecture" and "computer organization" has become very fuzzy, if no completely confused or unusable. Computer architecture was essentially a contract with software stating unambiguously what the hardware does. The architecture was essentially a set of statements of the form "If you execute this instruction (or get an interrupt, etc.), then that is what happens. Computer organization, then, was a usually high-level description of the logic, memory, etc, used to implement that contract: These registers, those data paths, this connection to memory, etc.
Programs written to run on a particular computer architecture should always run correctly on that architecture no matter what computer organization (implementation) is used.
For example, both Intel and AMD processors have the same X86 architecture, but how the two companies implement that architecture (their computer organizations) is usually very different. The same programs run correctly on both, because the architecture is the same, but they may run at different speeds, because the organizations are different. Likewise, the many companies implementing MIPS, or ARM, or other processors are providing the same architecture - the same programs run correctly on all of them - but have very different high - level organizations inside them.
Answer:
He should disable UPnP technology to disallow devices to dynamically add themselves to the network without configuration.
Explanation:
- UPnP stands for Universal Plug n Play.
- It is an easiest way that allows gadgets to find all other devices connecting to your network.
- This can also modify router settings to allow devices from outside the network to access the router.
- External IP address can also be obtained by the gadget and a new port forwarding map can be set
- So from all perspectives, UPnP is an open invitation for hackers to scan for the ports and hack into the device.
- UPnP is a vulnerability to the secure system
