Answer:
$1,160
Explanation:
<em>Hie, I have attached the full question as an image below.</em>
The firm usually makes provision for certain amounts so as not to overstate their profits. This expected as it is prudent than reporting profits that might never occur. Provisions of Uncollectible accounts are examples of such amounts.
An increase in Uncollectible amount compared to the opening balance is treated as an Expense in the Income Statement whilst a decrease is treated as an Income.
For this question, we are told that Uncollectible accounts are determined by the percent-of-sales method to be 4% of credit sales. Thus calculation of the 2012 uncollectible-account expense is as follows :
Credit Sales - 2012 = $44,000
Beginning Balance in allowances = $600
Therefore,
Uncollectable Amount (2012) = Credit Sales x percent-of-sales
= $44,000 x 4%
= $1,760
The Uncollectable amount has increased by $1,160 ($1,760 - $600)
Conclusion :
The collectible-account expense for 2012 is $1,160
Answer:
$148.3 million
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the deferred tax liability that Isaac would report in its year-end 2021 balance sheet
Using this formula
Deferred tax liability=Total future taxable income × Tax rate
Let plug in the formula
Deferred tax liability=(2022 137 million+2023 129 million+2024 162 million+2025 165 million)*25%
Deferred tax liability=$593 million*25%
Deferred tax liability=$148.3 million
Therefore the deferred tax liability that Isaac would report in its year-end 2021 balance sheet is $148.3 million
Answer:
Public referendum
Explanation:
Public referendum
Raising debt limit is not one side decision it always been bilateral decision between public and government. it is done to raise the treasury of government. it is yearly program which may be initiate on the basis of condition of municipality funds. therefore it need referendum from public side to decide whether to increase the debt limit or not
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
According to the information above, there would be no sales if TAM is discontinued as there would be no cost traced to it safe for $145,000 for fixed manufacturing overhead.
We already know that the net operating loss was $55,000 the fixed manufacturing overhead of $145,000 would further increase the loss by $90,000
