Answer:
Explanation:
(1)
FV = PV x (1 + r)^N
FV = $75,000
PV = $35,000
r = 8%
75,000 = 35,000 x (1.08)^N
(1.08)N = 2.1429
N ln 1.08 = ln 2.1429
N = ln 2.1429 / ln 1.08 = 0.33 / 0.033 = 10 years
(2)
FV = Annual payment, A x PVA
FV = $43,700
n = 6 years
A = 8,000
43,700 = 8,000 x PVA
PVA = 5.4625
PVIFA (6 years, r%) = 5.4172
r=3%.
(3)
PV = Annual payment, A x PVIFA (r%, n years)
PV = $18,000
n = 6 years
r = 9%
$18,000 = A x PVIFA (9%, 6 years) = A x 4.4859 [From PVIFA table]
A = $18,000 / 4.4859 = $4,012.57
Answer:
b. surpluses of the commodity will develop
Explanation:
A price ceiling is when the government or an agency of the government sets the maximum price for a good or service.
If price ceiling is set above equilibrium price, suppliers would increase supply while consumers would reduce demand. This would lead to an excess supply and surplus in the economy.
When price ceiling is set above equilibrium price, it is known as a non binding price ceiling.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Demographic segmentation
Explanation:
Demographic segmentation can be defined as a market segmentation in which variables such as gender, ethnicity, age, income, occupation of potential customers are taken into consideration.
The market is divided into segment according to age, race, religion, gender, family size, ethnicity, income, and education.
Demographic segmentation makes information such as who will buy your products, where to sell your product, how to market your product available to the producer.
It ensures that customers are well cared for. When a producer focus on a particular group of customers, they will be more committed and dedicated to satisfying their customers. Demographic segmentation ensures customer satisfaction.
Answer:
Accounting can be tough. ... The course load is quite intense, with classes in mathematics, finance, business, and accounting. While some concepts can be challenging, by studying the material and taking the time to make sure you fully understand accounting principles, you can be successful.
<h3>Please mark as brainliest</h3>
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
B. They should be more willing to tear down the $50 million stadium, because it cost more to build.
C. The cost to build the old stadium shouldn’t be considered.
And this is the correct answer:
A. They should be more willing to tear down the $5 million stadium, because it cost less to build.
Explanation:
City A will likely be more willing to tear down its old stadium because it costed $5 million to build. City B, on the other hand, will have to think twice because a stadium that costed $50 billion to build could have more value than it seems, or the City could simply not have enough money to build a better new stadium (something that would probably cost more than $50 billion to do).
