Answer:
The last listed functional expression:
Step-by-step explanation:
It is important to notice that the two linear expressions that render such graph are parallel lines (same slope), and that the one valid for the left part of the domain, crosses the y-axis at the point (0,2), that is y = 2 when x = 0. On the other hand, if you prolong the line that describes the right hand side of the domain, that line will cross the y axis at a lower position than the previous one (0,1), that is y=1 when x = 0. This info gives us what the y-intercepts of the equations should be (the constant number that adds to the term in x in the equations: in the left section of the graph, the equation should have "x+2", while for the right section of the graph, the equation should have x+1.
It is also important to understand that the "solid" dot that is located in the region where the domain changes, (x=2) belongs to the domain on the right hand side of the graph, So, we are looking for a function definition that contains 
for the function, for the domain: 
.
Such definition is the one given last (bottom right) in your answer options.
You need to do 10 divided by 4. Each friend would get 2.5 pounds of a nut.
Answer:
#1 is -9
#2 is 3
Step-by-step explanation:
-9x3 is -27 then add 10 to that you get -17
5x3 is 15 then subtract 1 and you get 14
The cow will produce 520.25 in one day.
<span>Ayesha's right. There's a good trick for knowing if a number is a multiple of nine called "casting out nines." We just add up the digits, then add up the digits of the sum, and so on. If the result is nine the original number is a multiple of nine. We can stop early if we recognize if a number along the way is or isn't a multiple of nine. The same trick works with multiples of three; we have one if we end with 3, 6 or 9.
So </span>
<span>has a sum of digits 31 whose sum of digits is 4, so this isn't a multiple of nine. It will give a remainder of 4 when divided by 9; let's check.
</span>
<span>
</span>Let's focus on remainders when we divide by nine. The digit summing works because 1 and 10 have the same remainder when divided by nine, namely 1. So we see multiplying by 10 doesn't change the remainder. So
has the same remainder as
.
When Ayesha reverses the digits she doesn't change the sum of the digits, so she doesn't change the remainder. Since the two numbers have the same remainder, when we subtract them we'll get a number whose remainder is the difference, namely zero. That's why her method works.
<span>
It doesn't matter if the digits are larger or smaller or how many there are. We might want the first number bigger than the second so we get a positive difference, but even that doesn't matter; a negative difference will still be a multiple of nine. Let's pick a random number, reverse its digits, subtract, and check it's a multiple of nine:
</span>
