1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
uranmaximum [27]
3 years ago
8

a woman gives birth to a color-blind but otherwise normal daughter. The husband sues for a divorce on the grounds of adultery. W

ill his case stand up in court?
Law
1 answer:
DENIUS [597]3 years ago
8 0
Adultery- voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a person who is not his or her spouse.

From my understanding view point, I don’t think the husband will win this case. The two scenarios for a kid to be color blind is A) Passed down genes from his/her parents or B) The eyes or a part of the brain that helps you see colors get damaged.

In order for the wife to win she has to prove that her daughter has a damaged eye or brain to prove her reason on why she is colorblind, but she could also win by proving that her daughter is his as well from a DNA test.

But the only way for the dad to win is to prove that him and the wife are both NOT colorblind so there was no way that the daughter could’ve have gotten it from their genes and if he can prove to the judge that the daughter isn’t his with a DNA test then he will in fact win the case.

All in all it’s a really rare case that ever happens but it’s a 60/40 chance that the wife will win but it all depends on the evidence and factual support from both sides of the defendants can provide to the court.
You might be interested in
Please tell me the answer to 60+9
liq [111]

Answer:

69

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you know Catmemeslol then report her please, she is sending hurtful comments. Please all I need you to do is get this message
GrogVix [38]

YEAH!!!!! SAY IT BROTHA/SISTA

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
8.)
cluponka [151]

Answer:

Explanation:

8.)

In a personal injury trial, where the plaintiff alleges that because of the auto accident, she

is now suffering from extreme depression, the defense lawyer cross examines the plaintifr

regarding a prior treatment for depression, that was administered five years prior to the

accident. The plaintiff's attorney objects to any questions regarding the plaintiff's

past medical treatment for depression. What is the correct ruling re the prior treatment for

depression?

a) admissible in all personal injury actions

b) admissible due to the fact that he plaintiff has put her psychological condition at issue

c) inadmissible because of the doctor-patient privilege

d) inadmissible because it is irrelevant and prejudicial

9)

The necessary qualifications for a witness to testify as an expert witness are determined

by:

a) the Court (judge)

b) the Court and the prosecutor's office

c) the attorneys representing both parties with the Court approval

d) independent community agencies entrusted with such function

10.)

Which of the following correctly states the proper sequence of a criminal trial:

a) opening stmts./ motions in limine/ voir dire/ charge conf./ summations

b) motions in limine/ voir dire/ opening stmts./ people's case/defense case/ summations

c) motions in limine/ people's case/ charge conf./ voir dire/ defense case

d) people's case/defense case/voir dire/ charge conf./ summations

11.) According to the FRE, the testimony of an expert witness is

a) always admissible to assist the trier of fact

b) admissible if the expert's specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact

determining a fact in issue

c) inadmissible after the Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals case

d) inadmissiblebecause of the "Golden Rule"

12.)

In Frye v. United States, the Court held that expert testimony is admissible if

a) it meets the general acceptance requirement

b) it meets the totality of the circumstances test

c) it meets the FRE 403 balancing test

d) the expert is board certified in his/her field of expertise

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is deductible as dues, subscriptions, or publications? a. Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a tax attorney

Explanation:

Dues and subscriptions are professional expenses. They are tax-deductible subject to the 2% Adjusted Gross Income.

Professional subscriptions refer to any fees that the person may have to pay to get his business or profession registered with a "governing body" for which a license is required.

One cannot claim tax back on professional fees and subscriptions.

Subscription to the "Journal of Taxation" for a tax attorney is deductible as dues, subscriptions, or publications.

4 0
3 years ago
Why should the state provide free legal assistance to those<br>charged with really serious crimes?​
viktelen [127]

Access to justice is now more critical than ever. within the u. s., Americans need a lawyer’s help for everything from avoiding an unjust eviction to preventing a wrongful conviction. Yet, effective legal assistance remains out of reach for the bulk of american citizens. The gap between legal needs and also the services available exacerbates systemic inequities and downsides that may only grow over the subsequent four years. This series examines the state of access to justice within the u. s. and the way public and personal actors can collaborate to create justice equal for all Americans.

For two years, Mary Hicks paid $975 per month for a run-down Washington, D.C., apartment. When she contacted the owner about mold and mildew within the bathroom and holes within the walls, he did nothing. After Mary began to withhold rent, her landlord sued her.

Mary sought help from a law clinic. Her student attorneys not only kept her from being evicted and ensured that her landlord made the repairs but also reduced her rent to $480 after discovering that her unit was rent-controlled.1

Mary was fortunate. While 90 to 95 percent of landlords are represented by lawyers before the owner and Tenant Branch of the D.C. judicature, only 5 to 10 percent of tenants have legal assistance.2 Unlike criminal defendants, parties in civil cases don't have a generalized right to counsel. While all states provide a right to counsel for a minimum of some styles of civil cases, most parties in civil cases that involve high stakes and basic human needs, like housing, don't have a right to representation.3

In more than three-fourths of all civil trial cases within the u. s., a minimum of one litigant doesn't have a lawyer.4 Figures are even starker when it involves family law, violence, housing, and small-claims matters—those involving disputes over amounts up to $25,000, betting on the state. a minimum of one party lacks representation in 70 to 98 percent of those cases.5

And these are just the Americans who make it to court. Without access to legal advice, many are unaware of their legal rights and potential claims. Past estimates and more moderen state-by-state studies suggest that about 80 percent of the civil legal needs of these living in poverty go unmet6 in addition as 40 to 60 percent of the requirements of middle-income Americans.7 But because these figures rely upon self-selection and self-reporting, however, and since many Americans don't identify their unmet legal needs in and of itself, it's impossible to estimate Americans’ total unmet legal needs.8

To deny Americans access to legal assistance is to deny them their rights and protections. this can be because, to a greater degree than other countries, the u. s. places the burden on a private to hunt justice by visiting court.9 Other developed democracies have enshrined the proper to counsel in civil cases and devote 3 to 10 times more funding to civil legal aid than the u. s..10 In areas from environmental regulation and workplace discrimination to civil rights and housing, Americans must hire or find their own attorneys to enforce the law. The result's a divide between those that can afford legal assistance and people who cannot.

This issue brief is that the first during a series that examines access to justice as a long-neglected policy concern integral to American democracy—one that's under threat from the approaching administration.11 It provides important information on the U.S. justice gap and makes the case for prioritizing improvements in civil aid and indigent defense through legislative and infrastructure initiatives. It also outlines steps that state legislators, courts, and out of doors actors, like advocacy organizations, can desire make justice equal.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A sworn officer is so called because he or she
    12·1 answer
  • Give the most space to ___*
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT one of the checks and balances that Congress can use in relation to the executive branch?
    9·1 answer
  • Descripe two ways in which the law protect citizens against xenophobia​
    7·1 answer
  • Can you cry under water?
    5·2 answers
  • This branch has the power to appoint judges and give pardons.
    9·2 answers
  • What might a national fingerprint database not meet current law enforcement needs and be considered outdated?
    5·1 answer
  • Should the insanity defense be kept as is, changed in some way or abolished?
    11·2 answers
  • que mexicano ilustre propuso que las naciones debian dialogar para abanzar a sia un desarme y la paz en una etapa de la historia
    13·1 answer
  • Phân tích khái niệm, đặc điểm, vai trò của ngân sách nhà nước.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!