1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ycow [4]
4 years ago
12

What was the free soil party's stance on slavery?

History
1 answer:
KIM [24]4 years ago
7 0
The party<span> leadership consisted of anti-</span>slavery<span> former members of the Whig </span>Party<span> and the Democratic </span><span>Party.

The Purpose was to make slaves move west, and if they stepped on free soil they were free slaves.. </span>
You might be interested in
Attack imposed by government on imported or exported goods is called what
docker41 [41]
Do you mean a "tax" not "attack"? If so, the word you're looking for is "tariff". Tariffs are applied to goods that a government wants to limit the importation of exportation of for domestic, economic reasons.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the main way a representative democracy differs from a direct democracy?
Korolek [52]

____________________________________________________

Answer:

Your answer would be A). Citizens elect leaders who vote on the issues in a representative democracy, and citizens vote on the issues in a direct democracy.

____________________________________________________

In a representative democracy, Citizens elect leaders who vote on the issues. In a direct democracy, citizens vote on the issues.

____________________________________________________

Definition:

Representative Democracy:

Citizens vote for representatives to vote for issues in the country. The outcome of the situation is only determined by the votes of the representatives

Direct Democracy:

Citizens are the ones that could vote on a issue or topic. People directly decide on policies from voting.

____________________________________________________

Explanation:

The reason why A). Citizens elect leaders who vote on the issues in a representative democracy, and citizens vote on the issues in a direct democracy is CORRECT is because it is the right definitions for the two democracies. The representative democracy has citizens who vote for a  representative who votes for the people, while the direct democracy is votes that are directly decided by the Citizens. These two democracies are very different, and could range depending on what country it is applied to. Direct democracy is a very hard democracy, especially when the population is very high for a certain country. Countries with high populations usually use a representative democracy.

____________________________________________________

Why the other answer choices are incorrect:

Answer choice B). A representative democracy is modern, and a direct democracy is ancient. is INCORRECT because:

Both democracies were used in the ancient times, and are still used till this day around the world. Both democracies has been used in the Ancient times, and there is no way to call one of the democracies "out dated" since people before also decided if they wanted to use a representative democracy or a direct democracy.

Answer choice C). A representative democracy works better in small groups, and a direct democracy works better in large groups is INCORRECT because:

It is actually the opposite way around. A representative democracy works better with large populations, while a direct democracy works with a smaller population. If it was the opposite way around , the systems wouldn't function the way they were suppose to be. A direct democracy in a high populated country would be a mess since they would have to take every citizens votes. And having representatives in a small populated country wouldn't make any sense either

Answer choice D). Citizens’ desires are ignored in a representative democracy, and citizens’ desires have a better chance of being heard in a direct democracy is INCORRECT because:

Both democracies listen to what the citizens want. In the representative democracy, even though there are representatives who vote, the representatives represent what the people want, and the representatives don't vote from their own decision, they tend to listen to what the people want, and decide if what the citizens want is right or not. Citizens are NOT ignored in a representative democracy. One democracy doesn't have a higher chance of a citizens voice to be heard.

____________________________________________________

-Julie

8 0
3 years ago
how did the british government responded to the colonial concerns expressed during the Boston tea party
mylen [45]
The British Government responded to the colonials rebellion by Enacting the Tea Act, The Sugar act and more. Basically these acts were made to raise taxes. The colonist did not like the raise of even more taxes and resented by hosting boy cotts and open rebellion against the king.
3 0
3 years ago
Please I need help asap​
xenn [34]

Answer:

the number is divisible

7 0
2 years ago
Why did the Federalists Oppose the Louisiana Purchase?
scoundrel [369]
I'll help you message me because it's Gonna be a long answer
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Historians use a number of tools to research their subjects<br> True or False
    10·2 answers
  • What has historically supported the development of the seattle-tacoma area of the pacific northwest?
    11·1 answer
  • due to the multitude of kingdoms in Southern and Southern Asia, do u believe this lead to more wars and violence or less fightin
    8·1 answer
  • How did India distinct from the rest of Asia?
    13·1 answer
  • King george III responded to the boston tea party with a seriers of acts known in the american colonies as the
    8·2 answers
  • The four parts of the judicial system include the
    14·2 answers
  • How could one counter the argument that colonialism destroyed traditional structures?
    10·1 answer
  • Can someone make this longer
    14·1 answer
  • Can you help wit this
    9·2 answers
  • Which detail best supports the central idea of the article that Trudel's invitation to watch Rickie Fowler play was an extraordi
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!