After Frank Palko was sentenced to death by the state of Connecticut, the Supreme Court ruled that

Social Studies

2 answers:

kobusy [5.1K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The answer is: Protection against double risk is not a fundamental right and, therefore, is outside the constitutional protection.

Explanation:

The Supreme Court confirmed Palko's second conviction. In its majority opinion, Cardozo formulated principles that were to direct the actions of the Court during the next three decades. He pointed out that some guarantees of the Bill of Rights, such as freedom of thought and expression, are fundamental, and that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment absorbed these fundamental rights and applied them to the states. Protection against double danger was not a fundamental right. Palko died in the Connecticut electric chair on April 12, 1938.

The answer is: Protection against double risk is not a fundamental right and, therefore, is outside the constitutional protection.

klasskru [66]3 years ago

5 0

His conviction and execution should be upheld.

You might be interested in

Need help to unscramble these words.

quester [9]

I know that 2 is heat
but there is a site that is currently blocked for me rn. Its called unscrambled.com

If you can, try to find the rest of them there!
Happy to help!

8 0

3 years ago

Why was King John forced to sign the Magna Carta?

kykrilka [37]

Answer:

In 1215, King John of England was forced to sign the Magna Carta stating that the king was not above the law of the land and protecting the rights of the people. Today, the Magna Carta is considered one of the most important documents in the history of democracy.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

For each month that is listed briefly describe the event that happened?

allochka39001 [22]

Answer:

War of 1812, (June 18, 1812–February 17, 1815), conflict fought between the United States and Great Britain over British violations of U.S. maritime rights.

Hope This Helps.

4 0

2 years ago

The american focus on individuality and personal will masks the structural deficiencies and challenges facing people with disabi

Cloud [144]

The correct answer is ableism.
Ableism refers to a type of discrimination where people who are able, or without any form of disability, are favored in a society. They have privileges, whereas people with disabilities are discriminated against and are definitely not equal to 'able' people.

7 0

2 years ago

A politician says he is just fine with the idea of different classes of people since class differences motivate people to work h

Leto [7]

Answer:

b. conflict theory.

Explanation:

Conflict theory: In sociology, the term "conflict theory" was introduced by Karl Marx, and is described as a theory that is based on the idea that a specific society is in a state of "perpetual conflict" due to the competition associated with the limited resources. The conflict theory holds the idea that social order is being maintained via power and domination instead of conformity and consensus.

Example: It can be utilized for looking at revolutions, wars, forms of injustice, violence, & discrimination by describing that there's a "natural disparity in a particular society that leads to developing these problems.

In the question above, "the politician’s understanding of class corresponds to conflict theory".

7 0

2 years ago