The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Why would a monarch who is trying to restore his power say something like this?
The monarchs of those years thought like that for the following reason. They wanted to keep total power and control over their land and subjects. They feared any rebellious movement that could mean a confrontation to their authority and power because these kings knew that they could lose it.
That is why Prince Klemens von Metternich of Austria said "The first and greatest concern for the immense majority of every nation is the stability of laws, and that they never change." The more stability in its kingdom, the better for the king to preserve his dominion.
Kings did not want people to challenge their power.
One of the goals of the Congress of Vienna (1814-1815) was to restore Europe to the way it was before the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars.
When Napoleon was defeated, the victorious countries met to establish a plan that could offer a relative past to Europe after so many years of conflict. So they met in Vienna, Austria in the so-called Congress of Vienna, to change things after the reorder of the Napoleonic wars, trying to reestablish some monarchies. Peace and understanding functioned relatively well until the previous years of World War 1.
Congress began to reorganize the judiciary with the Judiciary Act of 1875. It shifted some kinds of trials from the circuit courts to the district courts and gave the circuit courts more responsibility for hearing appeals. It also expanded federal judicial power to almost the full extent allowed by the Constitution.
Hope this helps! Please don't report me or be mean to me!
At base, there is an ethical justification for the dropping of the bomb on Hiroshima as the United States was ready to mount a full scale invasion of Japan from China.
However, the Japanese were not given adequate time to surrender and so the dropping of the bomb on Nagasaki was inexcusable.
One way in which urban areas are different from rural areas in South America is that <u>C. </u><u>Urban centers </u><u>have </u><u>larger populations </u><u>of </u><u>wealthy citizens</u><u>. </u>
Characteristics of Urban areas
- A high population and population density.
- More economic opportunities.
As a result of these economic opportunities, there are better chances of getting rich in the urban areas which is why urban areas have a lot of wealthy people.
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on urban areas at brainly.com/question/25406987.
the underground railroad was a network of secret routes and safe houses used by the 1900's slaves of African descent.
Conductor- An individual who escorted slaves between "stations" or safe houses.
Station- Hiding places in safe houses
Lines- A route slaves took north to freedom
Freight- Escaped slaves
I really hope this help's!!!!
