Hmmmmmmmm?? ig it is..i dunno ?
I can think of one advantage: if this party wins, it will have a majority in the parliament and senate, so it will be have more power and would not have to negotiate every voting with the other party in the coalition.
In a multiple party when coalitions , the smaller party in the coalition usually gets proportionately much more power because it can "blackmail" the bigger partner; this often stalls the voting process.
The answer is B because it makes sense
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Companies passed on production and transportation costs to consumers</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
An increase in oil prices will add to a higher inflation level. This is on the grounds that transport costs will rise prompting more increased prices for many products. <em>This will be cost-push inflation which is very unique to inflation brought about by rising aggregate excess/demand growth. </em>
Consumers will see a decline in unrestricted income. They bear a higher cost of transportation, yet don't have the compensation of income rise. <em>Higher oil costs can prompt slower economic development – especially an issue if consumer spending is less.</em>
