D.
It established the precedent of judicial review, which balances the powers of the executive and legislative branches of government.
Third parties generally serve only to take votes from one of the main parties. Third parties generally serve only to take votes from one of the main parties. If the third party has a candidate promising similar things to the Rep. candidate, the Democrats are more likely to win simply because their votes are not being siphoned off. Think of it this way: if a school class were to vote on favorite colors and there were only blue and red to choose from, it would probably be mostly equal. But if the same class were to vote for blue, teal, and red, I would be willing to bet that red would win just because its votes weren't being split like the blue votes were. Teal is the third party. It won't ever win on its own, but it can be influential in that it can help the opposite party win.
Answer: Opportunity cost
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is basically arranging your schedule from that which is of great importance to the next, till the least important. It is understood that most of our activities are not giving same energy, especially when we understand some better than the others, this is where opportunity cost comes in, allowing you to arrange all activities from that which needs much attention to that which needs less, this is what Felix was doing that his wife needed to understand
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Scientific management refers to management philosophy where workflows are analysed and metabolized. Its main aim is to improve economic efficiency, particularly the productivity of labor.
It was one of the earliest attempts to apply science to process engineering and to management. For all the time being, the movement for scientific management produced revolutionary ideas — ideas like staff training, as well as the implementation of standardized best practices to increase productivity.
Thus, from the above we can conclude that the given statement is true.
Answer:
Following the excerpt from the citizens United case, I think corporations and organisations should be more restricted in their campaign donations.
Explanation:
At this moment, money plays a huge role in politics: companies use donations to help raise attention to problems the want to be taking care of, while at the same time avoiding others that could potentially be affect there own business.
This is a huge problem because there are many issues that politics should talk about, but they are not doing it because companies that pays money prefer that those subject are not talking about, like climate change and social injustice, for example.
Money in politics, especially when it comes for companies that have their own agenda, is dangerous because it put companies interested above public interest.
