Port cities of the middle colonies became bustling community centers because trade was very important and happened there. Many of the merchants lived in Philadelphia or New York City.
When deciding whether or not she should buy an expensive sweater, Nadina's id, ego and superego would play a role. These three components of Nadina's personality would respectively play a role as follows:
i) Id- This component of personality is basically known as the pleasure seeking component, without any rationality, logical and regard for consequences. In Nadina's instance her id would play a role in urging her to give into her desire for pleasure and buy the expensive sweater.
ii) Ego- The ego is a part of personality, that serves as a mediator between the pleasure-seeking and irrational id, and practical, real world aspects. The ego is characterized by reasoning and consideration of real-life, pragmatic aspects in the decision making process. Here, Nadina's ego would push her to think of a way to buy the sweater and devise a plan so that this purchase will not set back her finances greatly. For instance, Nadina might decide that if she buys the sweater, she can make up for it and justify the expense by fewer meals out for the next two weeks.
iii) Superego- This aspect of personality includes our morals, beliefs and values which we imbibe from our parents, teachers and other authority figures in society. When making decisions, we take these morals and beliefs into consideration. In Nadina's case, her superego would urge her not to buy the sweater since she cannot afford it and probably needs to spend her money mostly on essentials instead (food, rent, education, children, etc.)
Answer:
<em>Mitigate her damages</em>
Explanation:
A breach of contract involves the violation of any part of a signed agreement between two parties. For example, when a tenant destroys a property, he/ she has violated the contract with the house owner.
<h3>
Duty to Mitigate.</h3>
When there is a breach of contract, one of the two parties normally suffers damages, and he/she has a legal obligation to sue for mitigating damages. This minimizes the effect that the contract breach might have caused the person.
Valerie contracts Esteban for a project capable of destroying her land if not done properly and quickly. A breach of contract leads to the project been abandoned and if damages are done on the land, <em>Valerie is under a legal obligation to mitigate her damages through the court.</em>
<span>this causes some bias, because people without phones cannot be in the sample</span>
