1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anzhelika [568]
2 years ago
5

Help with the second picture please what the freak is a food web??????

Social Studies
2 answers:
PIT_PIT [208]2 years ago
7 0
An example of a food web is the plant absorbs the sunlight (producer). The grasshopper eats the plant (primary consumer). The hawk (tertiary consumer), spider, weasel, and shrew (all secondary consumers) eats the grasshopper. The spider is eaten by the weasel and shrew. The shrew is eaten by the hawk, weasel, and owl (tertiary consumer). The weasel is eaten by the hawk and owl. The hawk is eaten by the owl. The owl is the head of the food web.
I really hope this made sense and hope it helped!:)
Finger [1]2 years ago
4 0
Like a Food chain, so something eats something to grow
You might be interested in
CAN somone please please help me. I'll text u the question
algol13
Yes i can what is it


5 0
3 years ago
Which country use tax brackets as part of their tax system?
Elenna [48]
Tax brackets in Australia.
Tax brackets in Canada.
Tax brackets in India.
Tax brackets in Malta.
Tax brackets in the Netherlands.
Tax brackets in New Zealand.
Tax brackets in Singapore.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WILL GIVE 25 POINTS!!!!!
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Sanctuary Cities are abhorrent at best, and the reason is simple. One could back these ideas purely on principal, but instead the state and local governments that enact these sanctuary laws are doing so with only political motivation in mind. Much like every mass shooting, or every time something bad happens in our nation. The political dilemma we face is that these acts or carried out without pure intentions.

Pandering to a base by way of violating laws sets a terrible precedent going forward. it suggests that here our laws are different and "that line in the sand can move". what is a nation of laws which doesn't enforce them. The answer is a nation without a spine. A law is a law, and while one might disagree with the laws, and that is why we have a proper way of enacting changes we want to see done in our great nation.

This has been done with Marijuana in multiple states already, however cities and local governments do not hold a vote to allow residents to have a say. No, instead they declare the city as being a sanctuary, and depend on mob rule to force those who oppose into silence or to force them out of the city entirely.

If we want to make it easier for people to attain visas and green cards, let's have that discussion and vote on it. if we want to make the US open borders, let's have a discussion and vote on it. but to simply say "to hell with you" and violate the law of the land without the say so from the citizens of state and local municipalities is mob rule at best and a violation of the oathes of offices taken by those we elect into those offices.

Personally, I believe that it is too hard for immigrants to attain visas and green cards, and that isn't to mention the financial cost ranging in the thousands for a single person going through this process. I believe this system requires change and needs revision, but it is wrong to declare sanctuary cities and states. one because it is done with motivation of pandering to a base for political gain, and lastly it sets a precedent for lawlessness in our greater country and local and state governments.

If we are to be a nation of laws, then we must be a nation of laws and not lawlessness. If we are to be a nation of suggestions, then we should carry on as we are currently doing. I love to do what feels right, but it must be done in the right way, otherwise you add fuel to the fires of division in our nation, and as Abraham Lincoln once famously stated; "A divided house cannot stand".

5 0
3 years ago
What information are scientists gaining from human hair? how did isotopic analysis develop? how does isotopic analysis work? wha
pav-90 [236]

<span>1.   </span><span>The information scientists are getting from human hair is one single strand can inform you what you consume and drink in your diet. It can also enlighten you when and where the individual has been – geographic location.</span>

<span>
</span>

<span>2.   </span> It developed when a professor named Professor J. Ehleringer <span>from a university in Utah began puzzled what animals consume and drink and if they move over era. He then concludes that hair is like a tape recorder and it can demonstrate what an individual consumes, drinks, and where they were at that era.</span>

<span>
</span>

<span>3.   </span><span>An isotopic analysis works by getting oxygen and hydrogen. Their dissimilar isotopes are located in different clusters but it is depends on where the water comes from, then that mix gets put down in the tissues of the animals or humans that consume the water.</span>

<span>
</span>

<span>4.   </span>Through isotopic analysis, forensic scientists can recognize mutilated or weakened body; they can also recognize what is the history of his life.


<span>5.   </span><span>Forensic isotope analysis can help to identify a mutilated executed victim. </span>

4 0
3 years ago
Women's rights have historically been restricted by the Supreme Court's use of which of the following?
Aloiza [94]

Answer:

Women's rights have historically been restricted by the Supreme Court using the reasonableness standard.

Explanation:

The reasonableness standard is used in US courts to understand whether a plaintiff or defendant acted reasonably in a harassment situation, for example, and it has been used in cases against police where the plaintiff claims excessive violence was used. There is also the "reasonable woman standard" that has been used in US Supreme Court Cases like Harris vs. Forklift Systems 510 US 17 (1993).  The Supreme Court sided in favor of Harris who had to appeal two lower court decisions that found that Harris was not sufficiently psychologically impacted for the case to constitute harassment.  The reasonableness standard can be seen as limiting because it imposes the standards of what men find reasonable in a sexual situation and coworker relationship at the expense of what women may find uncomfortable or inappropriate.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When asked how she likes her dinner, samantha replied, "i likeded the pizza most!" her exclamation would be best described as an
    10·1 answer
  • Sexual harassment legislation is concerned with not just with the offender's intent but also the effects of the offender's behav
    12·1 answer
  • Are there legitimate grounds for denying people or groups of people admission to the united states
    6·1 answer
  • Kirby suffered a stroke and even though he has recovered much of his functioning, he finds that he still cannot move his left fo
    14·1 answer
  • 50 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    13·2 answers
  • 1/What is<br> the "Korean Wave?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the best title for this list?
    5·2 answers
  • What kind of government is represented by section C? А an oligarchy Government Power Citizen Participation a democracy an autocr
    8·1 answer
  • Explain 5 common cultural traits which Ghanaians different from people of the other countries​
    13·2 answers
  • Sophisticated use of contrast helps separate the most important data from the rest using the visual context that our brains natu
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!