Answer:
The correct answer is D) "None of the above is correct."
Explanation:
Drug companies are allowed to be monopolists in the drugs they discover to encourage research and development
Answer: A: 30 percent or less
Explanation:
Answer:
Ashley may not claim Candy as her dependant even if other requirements are met.
Explanation:
Ashley is single and lives with Barney, her boyfriend, and Candy, his 8-year-old daughter. Ashley paid all of the support for her household in 2018. Barney has earned income of $2,500 and had income tax withheld from his wages. He has no other income and is not required to file an income tax return. With one qualifying child, Barney may claim an earned income credit. Barney files an income tax return solely to obtain a refund of withheld income taxes and does not claim EIC. Because Barney does not have a filing requirement and filed only to obtain a refund of withheld income taxes, Candy is not considered the qualifying child of Barney or any other taxpayer
Based on the explanation given Ashley cannot claim Candy as an independent because of the tax payer rule. If other requirements are met, Ashley cannot claim Candy as dependent because the girl in question isn't her child . Moreover, Candy is the full responsibility of Barney. Candy is under Barney's care and is solely required by law to take care of her.
Answer:
pros
Recruit/source potential candidates
Corporate brand awareness/ employer branding
Brand ambassadors and increased engagement
Low cost investment
Ability to reach a wide audience
Targeted marketing
Networking capabilities
Ability to conduct research and focus groups
Training and Development
cons:
Decreased productivity/ lack of focus
Security and privacy concerns
Inappropriate online behavior
Brand reputation risks
Explanation: