The key problems are the patent trolls.
The so called patent trolls buy or obtain patents cheaply from companies that are struggling and need any money they can get. Then the trolls use the patents as legal weapons to threaten legal action to those they argue infringe their patents. The trolls are not interesting in manufacturing a new product (from the patent they obtained) or coming up with new ideas how to use it. <em>This way they are useless to invention and economy.</em>
The alleged infringer has to pay a licensing fee which can be very high. Some of the patent infringement claims are baseless and may stifle the company's production thu<em>s hinder development of a new product. </em>
Patent trolls buy a huge number of patents and then they misuse the patent system to shake down companies with their alleged claims. This way they limit and prevent competition as companies are afraid their new product has already been claimed by trolls.
Answer:
The correct grade which I think as the teacher is option A
Answer:
Option B.
Explanation:
Individualistic is the right answer.
Individualistic political culture sees the government as a device for discussing issues that value to individual residents and for seeking individual aims. In this culture, people interact with the state in the same way, they would communicate with a marketplace. They assume the government to afford goods and services they see as basic, and the public leaders and administrators who produce them anticipate to be recompensed for their works. Accordingly, under an Individualistic political culture, residents will tend to be more receptive of corruption from their executive officers and less likely to see governments as a noble profession in which all residents should engage.
Answer:
1-For this situation, we can see that the Independent factors are the activities of the respondent, onlooker declaration, representative proclamation, and forensic proof.
2-The needy factors are the litigant reactions, proof assessment, legal evaluations, and judge sees on the grounds that these factors rely upon the IVs.
3-My speculation as per this case will be. "Does the homicide was basic for burglary and is respondent defending proof". Right now, can finish up all the factors and information gathered from various assets.
