Answer:
$143,750
Explanation:
We have to first calculate the present value of the bargain purchase option:
PV = $200,000 / (1 + 6%)⁵ = $149,451.63
net lease amount = $790,000 - $149,452 = $640,548
PVIF Annuity due, 6%, 5 payments = 4.546
Annual payment = $640,548 / 4.456 = $143,750
Answer:
C. financial break-even point.
Explanation:
Break even point in economics is the point in the business, wherein cost and revenue generated are equal and business make no profit, no loss. Similary Financial break even has a same concept, however, it is a point in business, wherein earning before EBIT is equal to the fixed financial cost of the company and these fixed costs should be earned by the company to run its business and meet its fixed financial obligation. The earning above the financial break-even point is a profit to the shareholder.
Point in financial break even, wherein earning per share is equal to zero.
Answer:
Fayolism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it seems that the management of Mason Mills reflects the ideas and principles of Fayolism. This is a management theory developed by Henri Fayol, which states 14 principles explaining how management should communicate and lead their workers. Many of which state the importance of organization within the business in order for workers to know who to report to and keep everything running efficiently.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
$648,000
Explanation:
Given that;
Net income = $360,000
Interest expense = $72,000
Times interest earned = 10
Net Income + Interest expense + Tax expense ÷ Interest expense = Times interest earned.
($360,000 + $72,000 + Tax expense) /$72,000 = 10
Tax expense = $288,000
Therefore;
Sunderland's income before taxes for the year
= Net income + Tax expense
= $360,000 + $288,000
= $648,000
Answer: increased, trade- offs, marginal thinking, small.
Explanation:
According to the passage, The coach is weighing a slightly<u> increased </u>risk of losing against a slightly decreased risk of injury to the star quarterback. This weighing o<u>f trade-offs </u>is an example of <u>marginal thinking,</u> because the star quarterback was in for most of the game, and the coach's decision concerns <u>small </u>shifts in probabilities with the game nearly over.
