Answer:
13. Charlie would be excluded for cause;
14. the plaintiff provides proof only up to the level of “clear and convincing,” Casey can still be acquitted.
Explanation:
Since it was realised that Charlie has a relationship with on of the parties summoned for a case, this will lead to Charlie been removed and excluded for cause. This is because it is believed that due to the fact that he has a relationship with the person, there may be bias which may lead to a false outcome regarding the case.
For the second question, Cash can be acquitted if there's proof which is provided by the plaintiff and the proof is clear enough and convincing.
Complete Question:
The first two files attached contain the complete question
Answer:
Other file shows a step by step solution as follows
answer 1
answer2 etc
Quantity increases while price drops. "<span>The </span>law of demand<span> is a microeconomic </span>law<span> that states, all other factors being equal, as the price of a good or service increases, consumer </span>demand for the good or service will decrease, and vice versa." - i<span>nvestopedia.com </span>
Answer:
Value
Explanation:
Cassandra has determined that by satisfying customers they can increase their sales which is also witnessed from The VRIO analysis. This analysis shows that the product uniqueness, resources availability, internal and external analyses, etc are of the opinion that this service will bring value to the company.
