<u>The reason that Pablo Picasso, become wealthy during his lifetime and the artist, Vincent van Gogh, remain poor his entire life:</u>
Pablo Picasso and Vincent van Gogh had more features in common. They had unanimously indistinct style of arts which had become immediately identifiable.
In spite of all that, Picasso died as a rich man owning an estate which is estimated at nearly 750 million dollar whereas Van Gogh died as a pauper.
Studies claim that the reason behind this would be that, Van Gogh remained to be a loner and socially inactive. He was depending on his brother to meet the social world and in contrast Picasso was a charismatic active member in various social clubs where her had multiple number of contacts and connections.
It's been said that Pablo Picasso was a hub who had a vast network of social lines and Vincent Van Gogh was a silent or solitary node.
But now, the paintings of both the greatest artists were well spoken and sell for more than 100,000,000 US Dollars.
Here u go this is really helpful I just had this question yw
Answer:
$8,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Average cost of car = $25,000
Now,
Using the class recovery system of five years,
The rate of depreciation expense in year 2 of the MACRS is 32%
Therefore,
The depreciation expense in the year 2 will be
= Average cost of car × Rate of depreciation
= $25,000 × 32%
or
The depreciation expense in the year 2 = $8,000
Answer:
B) When the price of ice cream rose, the quantity demanded of ice cream fell and the demand for ice cream topping fell.
Explanation:
A rise in the price of a good would lead to a fall in the quantity demanded of the good.
So, a rise in the price of ice-cream would lead to fall in the quantity demanded of ice cream.
A rise in the price of ice-cream would lead to a fall in the demand for ice cream toppings.
