PRO An economy based on the relationship between supply and demand promotes healthy competition. Companies strive to offer better goods or services than other, similar companies. If one company offers more extensive goods and its profit margins increase, then that inspires its competitors to get innovative so that they can retain or gain some of that market. This lively symbiosis is the backbone of free enterprise, and is a huge positive. Consumers gain when companies compete to offer more products or services in varied, often more efficient ways. Consider how the shopping industry drastically changed during the last 10 years with Amazon able to ship products directly to consumers, saving them money and time spent driving to a “big box” store.
CON That potential for profit is as alluring as it is dangerous. In order to maximize the highest profit margin, potential companies often resort to unethical or even illegal behavior. The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill is arguably a symptom of such a mindset, because of rushing, that oil company caused a horrific natural disaster. Such behavior is detrimental to its employees, because a company is not paying attention to, safety protocols, for example. Rushing or not paying attention to safety protocols, can cause lives lost or at least caused sickness and injury. Free enterprise suffers when companies go completely unchecked and foster corrupt competition.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: In the real world, specialization is not complete. Why do countries not completely specialize? Would be, D: All of the above.
Explanation:
Specialization in the production of a good, or a service, or both, in the part of countries means that they will dedicate all their efforts exclusively to that good, service, or both. However, in reality, doing such a thing is not practical for any country. First, because customers are as varied as there are products and services, and they will choose to acquire varied products, and services. This means that countries will benefit more from offering varying goods and services, than from specializing. Also, not everything that might be specifically produced can be traded internationally and by not specializing a country increases its chances of having its goods and services traded. And lastly, because production of most goods, and services, involves increasing opportunity costs. This is why the answer is D, because all of the other options are part of the reason why.
<span>By 1990, the former communist leaders were out of power, free elections were held, and Germany was whole again.</span>
Answer:
a. adjustment and growth
Explanation:
Ursula M. Staudinger is a German psychologist and aging researcher born on April 3, 1959. According to my research on Staudinger's studies, I can say that based on the information provided within the question their perspective reconciles these differences by suggesting personality takes on two forms: adjustment and growth. Since they believed these were the two trajectories of Positive Personality Development across Adults.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
During the decline, the Roman army had been severely weakened to the
point where invaders that could have previously been defeated by the
Empire were eventually able to destroy it. Ultimately, the Roman Empire
collapsed because of "the general failure of its armies to perform the
tasks that were required of them." One reason for the breakdown of the
army was that the Roman legions would fight in civil wars over their
choices for Emperor because they were unhappy with the weaker Emperors
that were frequent in the later Roman Empire. "These struggles served as
an irresistible invitation to German and other enemies to break into
the distracted provinces." Although the civil wars served as a
distraction to the Roman army, the wars also had a detrimental effect on
the army because they damaged its manpower, both in quality and
numbers.
The Roman army during this time was divided into the high
quality soldiers, called the field force, and the lower quality
soldiers, referred to as the frontier force, who did not fight as much
as the field force. The frontier force was mainly deployed to local
garrisons that were not as volatile as the places where the field forces
fought. Because of the civil wars between the legions and the battles
against outside invaders and enemies of the Western Roman Empire, the
field force was considerably weakened and greatly reduced in number.
The field force had to take second-rate soldiers from the frontier
force, thus lowering the quality of the army. The waning quality of the
Roman army was not its only concern; there were also not a sufficient
number of new soldiers being drafted. all the info is in there thank litpick.com i didnt write this
