<span> Pizarro seized the Inca emperor,Atahualpa,massacred the senior Inca nobility,extracted a huge ransom in gold and silver for Atahualpa,then murdered him.Pizarro then went on to conquer an effectively leaderless Inca empire.
Much the same with Cortes and the Aztecs - initially pretending to be friendly,Cortes seized the Aztec emperor,extracted a huge ransom for him before murdering him and,although forced to retreat shortly after by superior numbers,soon returned with Mexican native allies to destroy the Aztec empire and conquer it for Spain.
Cortes' conquest was much harder fought than that of Pizarro,but basically their interaction with the natives was the same - kidnap th leader,extort a ransom,kill the hostage anyway,then attack and conquer their people.</span>
<u>Answer:
</u>
We can apply some of the similar trends in classical civilizations to the historical experience of people of Teotihuacan to a limited extent as the similarity among the two was found in only the disciplines of politics and trade and commerce.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The administration in the ancient Teotihuacan society was sound and solid as the politics in the region was based on the idea of development.
- The methodology of trade and commerce used by the Teotihuacan people and some nuances of their trade matched with that of classical civilizations.
The dude is so inspiring. He was the leader of the civil rights movement, and he used non violent acts to spread awareness about discrimination. He is a legend. There are some awesome articles online about him, and you will be able to find so may things about him.
The political party that died was the Federalist Party. This should be your correct answer I hope it is
