Answer:
The correct answer is option C "design structured, rigid systems."
Explanation:
Unbending nature is the property of a structure that it doesn't twist or flex under an applied power. Something contrary to unbending nature is adaptability. In auxiliary inflexibility/regidity hypothesis, structures are shaped by assortments of items that are themselves unbending bodies, frequently expected to take basic geometric structures, for example, straight poles (line sections), with sets of articles associated by adaptable pivots. A structure is inflexible on the off chance that it can't flex; that is, if there is no persistent movement of the structure that safeguards the state of its unbending segments and the example of their associations at the pivots.
There are two basically various types of inflexibility or regidity. Limited or perceptible unbending nature implies that the structure won't flex, overlay, or curve by a positive sum. Minuscule unbending nature implies that the structure won't flex by even a sum that is too little to possibly be recognized even in principle. (In fact, that implies certain differential conditions have no nonzero arrangements.) The significance of limited inflexibility is self-evident, however microscopic unbending nature is additionally critical on the grounds that tiny adaptability in principle relates to genuine minute flexing, and subsequent crumbling of the structure.
New orleans, mobile, and pensacola were highly sought after by several different countries during the revolutionary war because the
New Orleans towns were located near the mississippi river, a major trade hub which in turn will made deliveries of goods to be faster. New Orleans also has Many Trade facilities. Improvement of the economy will also be in place because it a major trade center and will benefits those who are in control of it.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
I think, i learned this earlier in the year and my test had a question similar to this one, if it's not b then it's definitely
<u>Answer:
</u>
An example of followers using a wider variety of influence tactics than the leader to modify attitudes and behaviors of others would be the arrangement of furniture in the office or the prominently displayed symbols.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The leader, being the one who has the supreme most dignity and the highest status of all, has a conduct of behavior and approach to follow all the time.
- But this is not true with the followers that follow the leader. They can modify their behavior and activities whichever way they want and influence others in order to benefit the leader.
D Pearl Harbor because if they knocked out as many ships as possible they wouldn’t be able to fight in wwll
