What does a historian require in order to make a valid historical interpretation about an event?

History

2 answers:

katovenus [111]2 years ago

6 0

B because the n they would have the most evidence

Ugo [173]2 years ago

5 0

The correct answer is option B. "Primary or secondary sources related to the event". In order for a historian to make a valid historical interpretation, she or he must search for trustworthy information in the form of primary or secondary sources of the event. Historical events, especially ones that happened many centuries ago, require for strong evidence to support any interpretation of the historian.

You might be interested in

TRUE or FALSE: The President or Executive Branch of the U.S. Government has implied (the opposite of specific) powers to purchas

IRINA_888 [86]

It would be falseeeeee

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In the United States, the change from the "cottage system" to the "factory system" first took place in which of the following in

umka21 [38]

In the United States, the change from the "cottage system" to the "factory system" first took place in which of the following industries?
Answer: <u>C. Cloth Weaving
</u>~Hope this helped :)<u>

</u>

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

During the Progressive Era from 1880‐1920, Americans began to initiate laws, create

Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

Popular Sovereignty

Explanation:

The Progressive Era was a period of social activism and political reform in which many civilians participated (direct democracy) in order to reform the vertical (hierarchy) political system. Among the targets were the political machines with their corrupt and malfunctioning representatives.

Popular Sovereignty, that dates back to the Enlightenment, is the purest of (and most horizontal) democratic government, in the sense that the goverment´s purpose should be to protect (the civil rights) and serve the people, and not the other way around. And if they fail to do, or are corrupt or both, so they should be replaced.

6 0

3 years ago

What were the result or results of the contact between the Aztecs and the Conquistadores? What happened to the Aztec culture? Ho

kompoz [17]

The Spanish influence improved Aztec civilisation by introducing new ideas and technologies. They shared European agricultural techniques, domestic animals, sugar cane, wheat, and more with the Aztecs. The Spanish conquest was noteworthy because it put a stop to the Aztecs' ritualized killing of human beings. This is further explained below.

<h3>The Aztecs and the Conquistadores?</h3>

Generally, The Spanish colonization of Mexico and the subsequent fall of the Aztec Empire are variously referred to as the "Conquest of Mexico" or simply "the Spanish."

In conclusion, On August 13, 1521, Cortes was able to overcome Cuauhtemoc's resistance at Tenochtitlan with the support of the Aztecs' local enemies. It is estimated that 240,000 Aztecs perished in the city's capture, marking the end of the empire.