The answer to your question would be:
They wanted a strong central government.
Hope this helps :)
A.)
Canadian historians until the 1980s tended to focus on economic history, including labour history. In part this is because Canada has had far fewer political or military conflicts than other societies. This was especially true in the first half of the twentieth century when economic history was overwhelmingly dominant. Many of the most prominent English Canadian historians from this period were economic historians, such as Harold Innis, Donald Creighton and Arthur R. M. Lower samboo project. Scholars of Canadian history were heirs to the traditions that developed in Europe and the United States, but frameworks that worked well elsewhere often failed in Canada. The heavily Marxist influenced economic history that dominates Europe has little relevance to most of Canadian history.[citation needed] A focus on class, urban areas, and industry fails to address Canada's rural and resource based economy. Similarly, the monetarist school that is dominant in the United States also has been difficult to transfer north of the border.
The study of economic history in Canada became highly focused on economic geography, and for many years the dominant school of thought has been the staples thesis. This school of thought bases the study of the Canadian economy on the study of natural resources. This approach has since also become used outside of Canada, such as Australia and many developing nations.
Before the arrival of Europeans, the First Nations of what would become Canada had a large and vibrant trade network. Furs, tools, decorative items, and other goods were often transported thousands of kilometres, mostly by canoe throughout the many rivers and lakes of the region.
The early European history of the Canadian economy is usually studied through the staples thesis which argues the Canadian economy developed through the exploitation of a series of staples that would be exported to Europe. Studies show that Canada's economy is growing very well.
One time at my school a new girl came. She was in my class but thought that I wouldn’t like her. I started to play with but then I noticed that she was bossy at would steal stuff. This affected me because she would always boss me around.
GNI and GDP differ because GDP is the total market value of all goods and services produced domestically in a particular year or quarter, while GNI is an increase in GDP itself
<h2>Further explanation
</h2>
There are several calculations to measure the total production of a country, namely Gross Domestic Product, Gross National Product and Gross National Income, where GNI is an increase in GDP.
Gross Domestic Product or GDP is the total market value of all goods and services produced domestically in a particular year or quarter. GDP includes the income that foreigners generate while in the country. GDP does not include the income of residents who are abroad.
Gross National Income or GNI is GDP plus income paid to other countries by countries for things like interest and dividends.
Gross National Product or GNP is the total market value of all goods and services produced by domestic residents. GNP includes domestic income from goods and services produced and sold abroad and foreign investment. GNP does not include the income of foreign nationals while in the country. GDP and GNI refer to economic income within national borders while GNP refers to economic output by the country's population.
Learn more
GDP, GNP, and GNI brainly.com/question/1086262, brainly.com/question/13225398, brainly.com/question/853464
Details
Class: High School
Subject: Social studies
Keyword: Difference between GDP, GNP, and GNI.
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
This power was showed when Washington did not repeal the Whiskey Tax and instead showed up with an army as its commander.
