1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RideAnS [48]
3 years ago
9

(52 points)

English
1 answer:
igomit [66]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Graffiti should be considered a crime. If someone calls vandalizing other peoples property art, then that person is wrong. Graffiti is wrong because it is done on properties that the artist do not own , most of the time graffiti is disrespectful, and it is very costly to the community.

       Graffiti is wrong because it is done on properties that the artist do not own. If someone was to vandalize another persons home with graffiti written on it, that person would feel very disrespected. Although sometimes graffiti is beautiful, we would not want a person to vandalize our property and have them call it art. It would be fine if a graffiti artist were to draw on their own property because it belongs to them. It is very disrespectful for someone to draw on someone else's property without permission. Which brings me to my second point.

         Most of the time graffiti is disrespectful. The artist have no concern on what they draw that might offend other people who have the chance to see it.  Graffiti artist are truly gifted, so this means they can make their art look very realistic. Someone might say, if someone does not want to see it then they should not look. Whoever might say that is very wrong. Graffiti artist tend to draw art on almost anything that they can. This means they draw it for the public to see, whether the public wishes to see it or not. Some graffiti artist do not care what they write, but parents do. A parents does not want to walk with their child somewhere crowded, and see something inappropriate drawn or written for their child to see. Which brings me to my third and final point.

         Graffiti is very costly to the community to get it removed. That is why graffiti artist should not draw offensive things, but they do anyway and the community has to pay to get it removed. This is just like the app Instagram. If someone were to post something offensive towards the public, someone would report it, so it could get removed because what they saw were either offensive to them, their children, or they were thinking about everyone else that might come across that post. This relates to graffiti. If the community were to leave something that were offensive to the community there would be problems, not small problems, but big enough problems that could get people hurt.

         Although graffiti is a wonderful thing to see, it should be called a crime because it can corrupt young minds and cause problems.

   

Explanation:

Sorry if this is not what you were looking for!

You might be interested in
It is fragment sentence.<br> looked in his eyes and knew he was “the one”.
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Answer:

Yes it is?

Explanation:

I'm not sure what you are asking here but thanks for the point love ya PEACE

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is Atticus trying to prove through his questioning of Bob Ewell?
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

Atticus try to prove through questioning of Bob well that Mayella never went to a doctor, that she was never raped and the injuries on her face was caused by her father.

Explanation:

To kill a mocking bird is a novel that was written by Harper Lee in 1960. It was narrated by Scout Finch, a 6 year old girl who lived with her lawyer father and brother Jem in a small town mayocomb. In the novel Atticus was asked to defend Tom Robinson, a black man who was accussed of raping a white woman.

4 0
3 years ago
Study the following list of words. Check all the words which could be categorized as QUICK words. Use your dictionary or thesaur
pentagon [3]
Rapid, dart, speedy, zoom, dash, hurry

I hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
What strategy should the author use in order to persuade a reasonable audience?
Eduardwww [97]
Presenting sound reasons and credible evidence for the author's claim.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP!!
Rufina [12.5K]

Answer:

to ensure that all of the facts in your report are accurate

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the social and historical context in mad max fury road
    6·1 answer
  • Read the passage from "Improve the Zoo!" Some may think that the extra money should be spent on things that are more important,
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of a caravan?
    7·2 answers
  • How are similes and metaphors different
    14·1 answer
  • What image of late nineteenth century British society does the importance of being earnest
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following sentences best describes the author's central claim in this excerpt?
    15·2 answers
  • grammar corrections for this sentence after all theses wonderful meals, the meatloaf served today tastes terribly.
    11·2 answers
  • Read this paragraph. Rico opened his laptop and began his Internet search. He recalled with frustration the "B-" he had earned o
    15·1 answer
  • Help please ?? due today ,
    8·1 answer
  • Part B
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!