Answer:
Berlin Conferences of 1884
Explanation:
Found via a internet search,
hope it helps!
The improvement of African subjection in North American provinces was inescapable as a result of the earlier ramifications that drifted over the New World. English pilgrims approached the Americas with a similar outlook that Europe had back in the 1600's. They imagined that slaves were conservative and splendidly typical for a landowner to have. The landowners required somebody to pick the cotton and man the field while they sought after different business wanders. Without bondage, there would have been an absence of valuable crude materials in light of the fact that there would be no one to do the physical work that an estate needs to thrive. The encomia framework and the British sugar provinces simply made it less demanding in conveying bondage toward the southern settlements since it fundamentally expressed that servitude is something that a region must be effective. These laws made it appear as though it was prudent to bring slaves from Africa to do the diligent work and physical work that no one else would do.
Answer: 36 to 9
Explanation: U first times 12 by three getting 36 then you times 3 by 3 getting 9
The answer is C.
Hamilton and Jefferson had a rather unhappy relationship. They were both leaders of the two first political parties; the Federalists (Hamilton), and the Democratic Republicans (Jefferson). Washington writes about how Jefferson and Hamilton were always arguing about their contrasting views on the Constitution. Hamilton believed that the Constitution should be loosely interpreted, whilst giving the government that majority of the power. Jefferson believed the Constitution should be strictly interpreted, giving the states more power.
Hope this helps! :)