1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergey [27]
3 years ago
12

True or False. Prior to the war of 1812 the north east states were against fighting the British again

History
2 answers:
arsen [322]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

After diplomacy and boycott had failed, the issue of national honor and independence came to the fore. Jackson, who still had scars from the first war of independence, held that opinion with a special conviction. American rights, but it was also a vindication of American identity. Finally, in June 1812, President James Madison called for war and overcame the opposition of northeast commercial interests.

pshichka [43]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The only time the states ever fought the British prior to 1812 was during the revoluntinary war

You might be interested in
yldnis became the ruling family. And while the Carolingians commanded the controlled the pillage and gift system, this doesn't e
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

Increased economic growth and trade  

Explanation:

The main objective of the invasions was the discovery of riches and the exploitation of the region's resources to promote trade and economic growth in the dominant nation. In this case, labor was needed to exploit these resources and the region's economic potential. This need for people working in the invaded areas was what led to the development of new states, which would work for the economic and commercial enrichment of the dominant nation.

3 0
3 years ago
Select ALL the correct answers.
Fantom [35]

time has a way of covering up the negative and the ugly. Rather than being a "happy time," the 1890's may have been one of the worst times for Americans.

First of all, the 1890's was a time when a very few individuals and families made fantastic fortunes and lived the life of kings. By the turn of the century Andrew Carnegie, the steel tycoon, made over $20 million a year tax-free (there were no income taxes then). Yet, the vast majority of Americans were barely getting by. One of Carnegie's steelworkers would have earned about $450 a year working 12-hour shifts six days a week.

This was also a time when thousands of immigrants were flooding into the country from Europe. Many of these immigrants remained in the eastern industrial cities working for low wages in dirty and dangerous jobs. During the 1890's, the United States had one of the highest industrial accident rates in the world. Yet, workers who were severely injured or crippled could rarely collect any compensation.

Strikes were illegal at this time. Workers who attempted to go out on strike were often arrested or even beaten up by company thugs. A particularly ugly situation developed at Andrew Carnegie's Homestead steel works outside of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in 1892. Open warfare broke out between strikers and private guards hired by Carnegie to break the strike. Rifles and even cannons were used in a series of battles between the two sides that left 10 dead.

Times were tough for rural Americans, too. Farmers constantly complained that their lives were ruled by eastern bankers and railroad men. Farmers had to contend with high interest rates for loans in order to buy land, seed and farm equipment. They also had to pay outrageous freight rates set by the railroads in order to get their products to market. Many farm foreclosures resulted when crops failed or prices for farm products dropped.

All these economic problems increased in 1893 when a severe economic depression struck. Many thousands of Americans lost their jobs, farms and homes. The prevailing attitude of government, however, was to stay out of the way of private business. Little was done by the government, from Congress on down to city councils, to reduce the economic suffering of the people.

Corruption and Reform

During the early years of the new century, those individuals who tried to approach government with proposals to improve the lot of factory workers, farmers and small businessmen had little success. Especially at the local and state levels of government, lawmakers were often controlled by political machines and special interest groups. At this time, local and state government reached a low point in American history. Greed, corruption, and outright bribery were common among many politicians.

A New York Times editorial of July 3, 1911, complained that "Respectable and well-meaning men all over the State and especially in this city, are going about saying: 'What is the use? You only replace one lot of rascals by another, generally worse."' Across the country in California, the Southern Pacific Railroad controlled the state legislature and dictated how the state should be run. This was always to the benefit of the railroad. In many states at this time, railroads and other large corporations saw to it that legislatures did nothing to interfere with their profits, power and privilege.

By the early 1900's, reform minded individuals and groups spoke out increasingly against the "robber barons," as the big bankers, industrialists and railroad men were called. Farm, labor, and small business groups along with ministers and journalists charged that the enormous wealth of big business was secured by exploiting hardworking Americans. Political cartoonists portrayed big corporations like the Southern Pacific Railroad as grasping octopuses. A particular target of the reformers were city and state governments that often cooperated or were regularly paid off by the big business interests.

The period from 1890 to 1917 was a time of intense reform activity in the United States. Many different reform movements existed at this time, ranging from farmers who wanted to regulate railroad freight rates, to women fighting for the right to vote, to city social workers trying to improve the health of immigrant children. Generally, these advocates of reform were middle class professionals and small businessmen, both Republicans and Democrats. They wanted changes to take place in American society, but not radical or revolutionary changes. They wanted government to take a more active role in regulating big business. They also realized that before meaningful changes could take place, the stranglehold over local and state government by corrupt politicians and the huge corporations had to be broken. The reformers of this time called themselves "progressives."

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Did Jane Addams' actions show a belief in Social Gospel or in social darwanism?
tamaranim1 [39]

Jane Addams' actions showed a belief in Social Gospel. Addams was an American activist and social workers who is known as the "mother of social work". Throughout her life she was a prominent leader in women's suffrage and helped America on issues such as world peace, local public health and acted as an advocate for middle class women. In 1931 she became the first American woman to win the <u>Nobel Peace Prize</u>.

Social Gospel, the religious movement Addams believed in, emerged in the late 19th century and aimed to solve problems caused mainly by industrialization and urbanization. It advocated these issues by applying Christian principles and the teachings of Jesus - particulary, his second commandment: <em>"love thy neighbor as thyself". </em>Social Gospel was all about looking our for the good of all, they firmly believed that wealth was meant to be shared.<em> </em>Followers of this movement did not believe in Social Darwinism or "the survival of the fittest".

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is an example of the spoils system​
Goshia [24]

Answer:In politics and government, a spoils system (also known as a patronage system) is a practice in which a political party, after winning an election, gives government civil service jobs to its supporters, friends, and relatives as a reward for working toward victory, and as an incentive to keep working for the party

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what two ways did the Etruscans influence the Romans?
liq [111]

Answer:

Etruscan influence on ancient Roman culture was profound and it was from the Etruscans that the Romans inherited many of their own cultural and artistic traditions, from the spectacle of gladiatorial combat, to hydraulic engineering, temple design, and religious ritual, among many other things.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In the colonies of which European power did colonist have considerable responsibility for their own government
    13·1 answer
  • A strong nation attempt to expand its territory by military conquest, political or economic domination, or colonialization, is i
    14·1 answer
  • Jeb looked through a magazine and found an article called “A Look Back at the Civil War.” What would be the quickest way for him
    7·1 answer
  • Which bill of rights was a precursor to the American bill of rights
    5·2 answers
  • Why did Wilson support the league of nations?
    12·1 answer
  • Which achievements is rome known for? roads; concrete; domes telescope; roads; paper domes; writings; bronze arches; the wheel;
    13·2 answers
  • If the so called summer of Love signaled a transformation of young white people, what kind of transformation was taking place am
    10·2 answers
  • A group of nomads have stopped moving to follow herds of deer because they have figured out how to farm and grow crops. They wil
    13·1 answer
  • What precipitated the battle of little bighorn?
    12·1 answer
  • What are the names of Noah's sons?<br>​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!