<span>Many historians suggest
that the early American civil war they used the Napoleonic tactics. They
utilized this tactics mostly in battle even though the weapon they had was
capable of more advanced tactic. During
the encounter and in the battlefield, their men would be in a tight formation,
soldiers close with one another (elbow-to-elbow formation). Moreover, Guelzo
asserted than within 600 years the guns they had during their time was apt but
because of the smoke released by gun, soldier’s visibility would be at risk. Hence,
even though technology and weaponry was developing the generals in the civil
war never minded using alternate tactics instead they stick into what’s
traditional. The usage of skirmishes was utterly significant instead. They were
practical and improving methodologies and tactics in the field of battle and
combat to combat exercises rather than tools of war –weapons. </span>
Answer:
First question: He had no other option. Japanese forces were so good at prolonging U.S. Troops advancement that if he hadn't dropped the bombs the war could go on for months possibly years. He didn't want to drop them, but it was pressure from his advisers that it was a better option than losing anymore American lives. Second question: His other option was to continue what they were already doing, taking as much ground they could inch by inch until they took the country's capital. Third question: The Emperor of Japan hesitated thinking we couldn't possibly have a second bomb, which prompted the U.S. to drop another.
