1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lunna [17]
3 years ago
12

Paul Revere and Samuel Adams were successful in portaying violence in boston as?

History
2 answers:
Paul [167]3 years ago
5 0
<span>Paul Revere and Samuel Adams were successful in portaying violence in boston as </span>patriotic
babymother [125]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

An attack by soldiers on peaceful colonists

Explanation:

As Revere and Adams portrayed it, the Boston Massacre was a deadly riot that occurred on March 5th, 1770, on King Street in Boston. It began as a street conflict between American colonists and a British soldier, but it suddenly became a violent slaughter in which many soldiers attacked American colonists. It enforced the anti-British feeling.

You might be interested in
What were the pros and cons of living in mesopotamia
Bezzdna [24]

Explanation:

The land was much more fertile, which made it perfect for farming. The disadvantages of living in Sumer were: The two rivers would sometimes overflow. Because of the excess water sometimes very many crops would not grow. I hope that helps.

3 0
3 years ago
When limiting factors increase, how is the diversity of a population affected?
Anvisha [2.4K]
Limiting factor can be birth rate or death rate 
3 0
3 years ago
The timeline below provides details about American imperialism.
castortr0y [4]

The most adequate argument in favor of these changes was the colonial peoples are inviting the American leadership to develop their economy.

American Imperialism is a series of historical events characterized by American intervention in the territory of other countries since the 18th century.

The imperialism exercised by the United States to a large extent was given by the endorsement of the governments of the intervened countries. For example, in South American countries where a Creole elite had established itself in government, the United States was seen as a support to strengthen the establishment of new nations.

Additionally, during the 20th century, the United States was the country called upon to intervene to prevent the emergence of left-wing movements influenced by the ideas of the Soviet Union.

Another important aspect is that the countries offered the United States their natural resources as a form of commercial exchange and to acquire financial status at the international level.

Note: This question is incomplete because the image is missing. However I can answer it based on my general prior knowledge.

Learn more about the imperialist in: brainly.com/question/3751284

4 0
2 years ago
German conquered west Rome, why did they fail to inherit the roman achievement and rule west rome?
Harrizon [31]
The Germanic tribes that took over the Roman Empire territory in the west had a history as tribal and hunting/agricultural societies.   Even in times when it was fracturing in many ways, the Roman Empire was built around central organization and governance.  The Germanic tribes had been more loyal to their own tribal groups than they were confederated into a unity with one another.  Their historical patterns of development also had been more built around hunting and farming.  They were not as developed in coordinating government over a massive stretch of territory.  The Germans had begun learning things from the Romans during the years when many of them served as mercenaries in Roman armies.  And they would learn more about building a far-reaching system of government.  They were not ignorant "barbarians" when they took over Roman territory, but they weren't united in a plan to govern the region as a unit the way Rome had.

For comparison, you might think of the difference between the Native American nations that existed in North America when settlers from Europe came and took over their territory.  In that case, the situation was reversed. The native tribal nations were used to operating independently as their own tribal nations, and were focused largely on hunting and agriculture. The white settlers were aiming at building a society more similar to how Rome had operated.
5 0
3 years ago
Please tell me everything you know about these people:
nadezda [96]
One is a part of the civil war
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did US involvement in the crisis affect US foreign policy? Identify two consequences of US actions.
    7·2 answers
  • Not paying taxes is a serious crime that can result in heavy fines and jail time. This is because
    8·1 answer
  • Identify a reason for the decline of the Roman Empire.
    14·2 answers
  • What was added to the constitution that listed rights not already in the constitution
    14·1 answer
  • What would happen if you didnt sit on a jury
    5·1 answer
  • Ghandi never wore western style clothes.<br> a. true<br> b. False
    7·1 answer
  • Question Navigator Select all choices that apply. 6. (3 pt) Which sentences use a time-related term correctly? Choose all answer
    11·1 answer
  • ×Why do you think previous leaders of the country did not want the “common man” to vote? A. they distrusted the average American
    10·2 answers
  • What would you predict the author’s perspective will be on the Stamp Act?
    11·2 answers
  • What are the three main mountain ranges in India?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!