No, this is not a public good. Firefighters work for money and save lives for a living. The government already provides this good to the public, by hiring the firefighters. In my opinion, the government should always provide this good, if someone is in the dire help of need and has no way out of fixing it, ex. fire, then who would be able to save them? The public? I wouldn't think so. A public good is defined as a fundraising organization raising money, or doing something for no profit.
Tiananmen Square
The fall of the Berlin Wall
Anti-Apartheid movement
A conclusion we can draw from the above is that b
. Baghdad had a rich economy that supported a large population.
From the way Yakut al-Hamawi described Baghdad, we can tell that it is a city that has a rich economy because:
- it had many suburbs
- rich bazaars
- finely built Mosques and baths, and,
- villas
For these to be built in a place, the place must have a great economy capable of affording them. We can also tell the population was large as there were over two million people there.
In conclusion, Baghdad was a great city with a strong economy and a large population.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/18822055.</em>
Trade Restriactions would be a good title. Embargoes limit and restrict trade between nations, Quotas limit the quantity of goods being traded, Subsidies make certain goods cheaper to produce in foreign markets, and a Teriff is a tax put on imports and exports.
