Answer: Actus Reus
Explanation: Actus reus is a Latin term for "guilty act".
It was coined form a principle stated by Edward Coke "<em>actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea" </em>which means "an act does not make a person guilty unless their mind is also guilty".
It is a criminal act that is characterized by a voluntary body movement. It is any physical activity that causes harm to others or destruction of properties.
In this case, Rashaad killed his wife and friend by an act of commission also called actus reus because for an actus reus to be committed there has to have been an act.
T made political and economic sense for some to do so.
Explanation:
First off, not all Native Americans supported the French during the colonial wars. Most Algonquian speakers supported the French and most Iroquois supported the English. In general, the key concepts here are economic power and political power.
The fur trade dominated colonial relations from the Ohio Valley and the Upper Midwest. Whoever controlled the economy of that area would have both economic and political power. The Iroquois were positioned to control trade via the Great Lakes. Algonquian speakers were able to go around them and deal directly with Europeans. Iroquois leaders attempted to push into the interior using British guns while Algonquians pushed the Lakota out of Minnesota and onto the plains.
Many Algonquians intermarried with the French and created a new ethnic group, the Metis who also aligned with the French, in part, because both were Catholic.
They have a better chance at making their case stronger and winning in court if they had two more testimonies
