Answer:
a. nations will be unable to specialize in what they are good at and therefore end up consuming less
Explanation:
There is no country that can produce all goods and services efficiently (at the least cost ). It is for this reason that trade between countries becomes necessary. Trade between countries gives countries the opportunity to concentrate on the production of goods in which it is efficient in production and purchase goods for which it produces at higher costs.
If trade between nations is prohibited, countries would have to produce goods that they are both efficient and ijefficient in their production, resources would be wasted, specialisation in the production of goods would not occur and consumption would fall.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
The correct answer is ENRON.
Explanation:
Going back to December 2, 2001, is going back to one of the biggest scandals in economic history. That day, the energy company Enron declared bankruptcy. First global energy distributor, invoiced 100,000 million dollars annually.
Jeffrey Skilling, the mind behind accounting, did his last master move badly. Before the bankruptcy they were seen coming, he resigned his position alleging family reasons and sold the shares he had in the company. Four months later came bankruptcy. Supposedly, he didn't know anything about the critical situation of the company. He did not strain.
In 2004 he was charged with about thirty charges, including operating with confidential information, by selling about 60 million dollars in Enron shares before bankruptcy, deceiving the auditor or conspiracy.
Answer:
4,000 units
Explanation:
Given that
Sales volume = 60,000 units
Budgeted production = 54,000 units
Beginning finished goods = 10,000 units
The computation of units for ending finished goods inventory is computed below:-
Budgeted production = Ending finished goods + Sales volume - Beginning finished goods
54,000 = Ending finished goods + 60,000 - 10,000
54,000 = Ending finished goods + 50,000
= 4,000 units
Changes in commodity prices
I believe it's cross examination (the interrogation of a witness called by one's opponent). But I'm not 100% positive.
