Answer:
1. Rise
2. Increasing
3. Rise
Explanation:
For example, the sticky-wage theory asserts that output prices adjust more quickly to changes in the price level than wages do, in part because of long-term wage contracts. Suppose a firm signs a contract agreeing to pay its workers $15 per hour for the next year, based on an expected price level of 100. If the actual price level turns out to be 110, the firm's output prices will RISE, and the wages the firm pays its workers will remain fixed at the contracted level. The firm will respond to the unexpected increase in the price level by INCREASING the quantity of output it supplies. If many firms face similarly rigid wage contracts, the unexpected increase in the price level causes the quantity of output supplied to RISE above the natural level of output in the short run.
The above explanation is the reason why the aggregate supply curve slopes upward in the short run
Answer:
Debit: Accounts Receivable 707,350
Credit: Sales Revenue 658,000
Credit: Sales taxes payable ([6% + 1.5%] × $658,000) = $49,350
Explanation:
Yes, because harassing grandma is unnecessary and rude.
Answer:
The Hewitt's leadership falls on the the Middle of Road Management, which is carefully assessed, realistic and in turn creates a balance between concerns for people and production.
The shortcomings of this leadership are, Failure to motivate and inspire people, lack of passion and enthusiasm, Inability to keep workers.
Explanation:
Solution:
(a) The leadership of Hewitt fall towards the Middle of Road Management at 5,5 points, as it is well realistic, carefully assessed or adjusted, and satisfies the concerns for the people and production.
(b) The shortcomings or defaults discovered in Hewitt's Leadership is stated as follows:
- The failure to motivate and inspire people
- The Inability to retain employees or workers
- The lack of passion and willingness or zeal
- The lack of appreciation on employee or individual
Answer:
Suboptimization
Explanation:
Suboptimization is a term that has been adopted for a common policy mistake. It refers to the practice of focusing on one component of a total and making changes intended to improve that one component and ignoring the effects on the other components.
