Answer:
1. "He took a four-mile, 25-minute ride with his friends that left him severely distressed." --> description
2. "But his symptoms worsened overnight, and his heart was still racing at 130 beats per minute when Krauss saw him two months later." --> fact
3. "The doctor's diagnosis was short and to the point: ‘over-cycling.’ --> expert's testimony
Explanation:
There are several types of evidence that can be used in writing or speaking. Different types of evidence have different influential powers according to the context in which they are used as well as their purpose.
Evidence number 1 is a description: it offers information as to what happened; how and when the problem being addressed started. Evidence number 2 is a fact: an occurrence verifiable through observation or research. In this case, it is the heartbeat rate that is easily verifiable. Finally, evidence number 3 is an expert's testimony: a reliable opinion given by someone who has expertise in a certain area. The doctor, who is a specialist in health, came to the conclusion that over-cycling was the cause of the issues.
Using reserved and delegated powers, the Constitution divided the state and federal laws
Answer:
The physiologies of humans and some animals are very similar, so the reactions of these creatures to certain medications are the most reliable guide to the possible reactions of human patients.
Scientists are more easily able to control an animal's environment, such as diet and temperature, than they are that of humans, which makes the tests far more reliable than alternative methods.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the claim and the counterclaim that come with this question:
<em>Claim:</em><em> Although many people argue that medical testing on animals is a violation of animal rights, the benefits it yields for society far outweigh any argument that can be made.</em>
<em>Counterclaim: </em><em>There are safer and more accurate ways to test medications without using animals.</em>
This is the evidence that would most weaken the counterclaim. In this example, the counterclaim states that there are other safer and more accurate ways of testing medications besides the use of animals. However, this evidence shows that these tests are the most accurate because of the similar physiologies of some animals and some humans. It also shows that these tests are safer because it is easier to control an animal's environment than that of a human.
