All categories

3 years ago

When boating on a river, you may encounter strainers. what is the danger of a strainer?

Business

2 answers:

RUDIKE [14]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The correct answer is that the danger caused by a strainer could make the person above the boat falls down into the river or even worse like get trapped into the strainer.

Explanation:

A strainer is a natural obstruction in a river that could also be created by the man kind for a purpose like avoinding the water to flow in a certain direction. It represents the obstacle that makes more difficult to navigate for the person in the boat, examples of it could be such as trees or root systems.

Yuri [45]3 years ago

7 0

When boating on a river, you might encounter these strainers and the danger of these strainers is that they can possibly trap your boats and throw the passengers out of the boat. Strainer is the term that describes anything that obstructs the way in the river such as logs, or wire fence.

You might be interested in

If an oligopoly does not cooperate and each firm chooses its own quantity, the industry will produce a quantity of output that i

Whitepunk [10]

Answer:

a. less than; more than

Explanation:

An oligopoly is when there are few large firms operating in an industry.

A competitive industry is when there are many buyers and sellers of homogenous goods and services.

A Monopoly is when there is only one firm operating in an industry.

An oligopoly firm can choose to cooperate with other firms in the industry or not cooperate.

If firms do not cooperate they produce more goods than if they cooperated. The quantity produced can never be as much as that of a competitive firm because the number of producers in an oligopoly is less than that in a competitive firm.

The output would be more than the quantity produced by a monopoly because the number of producers in an oligopoly is more than that in a monopoly.

I hope my answer helps you.

6 0

3 years ago

Sheldon and Morton formed a partnership with capital contributions of $80,000 and $40,000, respectively. Their partnership agree

Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

The answer is:

Sheldon: $39, 500; Morton: $50, 500

Explanation:

A partnership is a binding agreement between two or more parties to carry on a business. The sole purpose of this agreement is to share skills and expertise so as to generate a profit. In a partnership, the partners have unlimited liability meaning that if the business established by the partners in unable to repay creditors, the creditors are legally allowed to seize the personal assets of the partners to cover the debts owing. However, in accounting for financial performance, the business is considered to be a separate entity (exists independent of the partners). Sheldon and Morton have established a profit-sharing arrangement that compensates Sheldon for the capital contribution (larger interest share) and Morton for his contributions to the business operations (larger salary share). The profit after these deductions is shared equally between the 2 partners. Assuming the given net income is after operations but before partner deductions, the share of the partners is calculated as follows:

Sheldon Morton

Interest $8,000 $4,000

Salaries $10,000 $25,000

Profit share $21, 500 $21, 500

Total share $39, 500 $50, 500

Interest (10% * $80, 000) (10% * $40, 000)

Profit share (50% * $43,000) (50% * $43,000)

Net Profit Share: $90, 000 - $(8,000 + 10,000 + 4,000 + 25,000)= $43,000

8 0

3 years ago

What is the purpose of a design brief?

Sedbober [7]

A project management document that allows you to identify the scope, scale, and core details of your upcoming design project.

7 0

3 years ago

Analyse, using a production possibility curve (PPC) diagram, the effect of an increase in enterprise on an economy.

Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer:

i dont get it what pls perfect sentence

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Rose has a $20,000 basis in the 60% of the Parent Corporation stock that she owns. Parent Corporation owns a 70% interest in Chi

Degger [83]

Answer:

The answer is: Rose will be taxed as receiving a $15,000 dividend distribution.

Explanation:

Since Parent Corporation owns 70% of Child Corporation, for tax purposes they are considered as one single firm. Rose is the main stockholder of Parent Co. so for tax purposes she is also a stockholder in Child Co. When Child Co. gives her $15,000 in exchange for Parent Co. stock, this would be considered as a dividend distribution rather a stock sale.

7 0

3 years ago