In the 1600's Imperialism was based around colonization in the Americas and establishing trade in the east. During this period the Americas were being colonized intensely by the Europeans that were racing to gain as much land and prestige as possible. In the east, however, the main goal was to reach the Spice Islands (modern day Indonesia) and establish trade routes for the spices the Europeans desperately craved. Comparatively, in the 1900's Imperialism consisted of taking up land in places such as India, Africa, and Southeast Asia. This was done in a "mission to civilize" meaning it was less about economics and now a more political and racial element were used to justify European conquest.
Hope this helps M8
<span>No. "In the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may be justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny..."</span>
Answer: Jefferson consistently spoke out against the international slave trade and outlawed it while he was President. He privately advocated gradual emancipation and colonization of domestic slaves rather than immediate manumission.
Explanation: Here
Answer:
If anyone today were given the opportunity to travel in time to live in one of those two city-‐states, Sparta should definitely be the one they chose. Sparta is far superior to Athens because their army was fierce and protective, girls received some education and women had more freedom than in other poleis.
Explanation:
pls mark me brainliest
