Answer:
B. S and I drop by $0.60 trillion.
Explanation:
We know that
Y = C + I + G
$12 trillion = $8 trillion + I + $2 trillion
$12 trillion = $10 trillion + I
So, I = $12 trillion - $10 trillion
= $2 trillion
As the government purchases increase from $2 trillion to $2.60 trillion
and the rest of the things remain the same.
So New I = $12 trillion - $8 trillion - $2.60 trillion
= $1.4 trillion
So, the difference would be equals to
= $2 trillion - $1.4 trillion
= $0.6 trillion
The $0.6 trillion reflect fall in the investment
And the saving and the investment are equal to each other
Hence, the B option is the right answer
Correct/Complete Question:
During a routine physical examination on an older female client, a nurse notes that the client is 5 feet, 3/8 inches (1.6 m) tall. The client states, "How is that possible? I was always 5 feet and 1/2? (1.7 m) tall." Which statement is the best response by the nurse?
a. "After age 40, height may show a gradual decrease as a result of spinal compression"
b. "After menopause, the body's bone density declines, resulting in a gradual loss of height."
c. "There may be some slight discrepancy between the measuring tools used."
d. "The posture begins to stoop after middle age."
Answer:
B, "After menopause, the body's density declines, resulting in a gradual loss of height."
Explanation:
The above statement in the answer section is the only response that answers the client's questions. This is because the statement answers properly, the question of why she has lost some inches in height.
Other options do not answer her question because the client records doesn't show spinal compression or any faults in measuring tools before that time.
i hope this helps.
Answer:
establish a more equitable result based on normative judgements. In the market for personal computers and in the stock market: 1) supply and demand shifts change prices and quantities.
Answer: When assessing the risks of investment, one should consider the political, economic, and legal risks of doing business in either Russia or Poland. The risk in Russia would probably be considered higher than the risk in Poland since Poland has been a member state of the European Union since 1 May 2004, with the Treaty of Accession 2003 signed on 16 April 2003 in Athens as the legal basis for Poland's accession to the EU.
Poland has already gained benefits and stability offered by the EU. Russia, by contrast, is still many years away from even being in a position to be considered by the EU for membership.
Explanation: A diligent investor wouldn't put a penny in a risky country.
