Answer:
$47,100
Explanation:
The cost of goods available for sale is the sum of the opening balance and the net purchases during the period.
The net purchases is the difference between the total purchases and the allowances and discounts and returns.
Hence,
Cost of goods available for sale
= $15,000 + $40,000 - $2,000 - $500 - $5,700 + $300
= $47,100
Answer:
Monopoly
Explanation:
Monopoly is a form of market structure when a particular company dominate the market of a particular product leaving room for little or no competition.
Answer: This is because the marginal rate of technical substitution is the ratio of the marginal product of labour to that of capital and for the output to be constant opportunity cost comes in, one input has to be reduced to increase the other input.
Explanation:
The marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS) shows the amount by which the quantity of an input can be lowered when an extra unit of another input is utilized on order for the output to remain constant.
The marginal rate of technical substitution is likely to reduce as more capital is substituted for labor because the marginal rate of technical substitution is the ratio of the marginal product of labour to that of capital and for the output to be constant opportunity cost comes in, one input has to be reduced to increase the other input.
Answer: $152,309.69
Explanation:
You are looking for the future value of this amount in 29 years assuming it will be compounded annually.
Future value = Amount * (1 + rate)^ number of years
= 4,400 * ( 1 + 13%)²⁹
= $152,309.69
Answer:
Variable overhead efficiency variance $ 8,018
<u> </u>Unfavorable
Explanation:
<em>Variable overhead efficiency variance: Variable overhead efficiency variance aims to determine whether or not their exist savings or extra cost incurred on variable overhead as a result of workers being faster or slower that expected. </em>
Since the variable overhead is charged using labour hours, any amount by which the actual labour hours differ from the standard allowable hours would result in a variance
Hours
2,700 units should have taken (2,700 × 3.20) 8640
but did take (actual hours) <u> 9,400</u>
Efficiency variance in hours 760 unfavorable
standard variable overhead cost per hour <u>$10.55</u>
Variable overhead efficiency variance $<u> 8,018 </u>Unfavorable
Variable overhead efficiency variance $ 8,018
<u> </u>Unfavorable