Answer:
Explanation:
It contains a different amount of neutrons in the nuclei than stable atoms.
Because they originated from same place and relegion called indians
Trade Sanctions. is a nonviolent means of coercion that the United States used then (and continues to use today)
Answer:
d. Rational, technical expertise rather than emotional ideology or public participation.
Explanation:
In the philosophy of bureaucratic authoritarianism, the head of the state is governed by the top bureaucrats.
Under bureaucratic authoritarianism, the military bureaucracy as well as the state bureaucracy comes together and they believe that the problems prevailing in the country can be solved consulting and communicating with the rational people and the technical experts of the society.
The State should not follow the emotional ideology to solve the problems which may led to uncertain consequences. Also taking help of the public participation to solve may arises many differences to the solution as many people will give varying solutions to the problems. The best way suited is to take the help of the technical experts and the rational people.
Thus the answer is
d. Rational, technical expertise rather than emotional ideology or public participation.
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
