Answer:
Asserts that development is determined by both biological and social factors
Explanation:
Eriksons's epigenetic principle of maturation states that everybody goes through a series of eight stages in life and each stage has a challenge that is to be faced and needs to be overcame in order to be psychologically equipped to move on to the next stage. These eight stages are the stages through which man pass through to attain maturity and it's determined by a fusion of both biological and social factors.
the vehicle
bc you don't want to hit it and its illegal
Answer:False
Explanation: There are various types of pollution and not all of these are restricted to cities.
For example pollution may result from improper disposal of waste and this is very likely to also occur in rural areas where you find that people may just dump waste on the rivers and lakes which in return affect activities such as fishing and swimming. Even the industrial water which may be dumped from the cities will still be carried away by rivers to reach other areas away from the cities. Nutrient pollution also comes from rural areas where there is a lot of farming happening and a high use of fertilizers , pesticides and herbicides which also have an impact as they get washed into the rivers and impact the quality of water such that the water becomes undrinkable.
So pollution is everywhere and there are different kinds of it.
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.