The fact that 70 percent to 90 percent of Americans report belonging to at least one interest group is evidence of the theory of pluralist theory.
Evidence is defined as anything that provides evidence or leads to a conclusion. A suspect's blood at a crime scene is an example of evidence. The footprints in the house are proof that someone broke in.
Evidence is an item submitted by a litigant to make the existence of a fact more or less likely. Evidence may take the form of testimony, documents, photographs, videos, audio recordings, DNA tests, or other tangible items. As a general rule, statements not made by a witness during testimony at trial are considered inadmissible as evidence of the facts stated. 13. However, this rule applies only if the statement proves the truth of its contents. This rule applies to both oral and written statements.
Learn more about evidence here
brainly.com/question/23873049
#SPJ4
Back then <span>Europeans prohibit trading between the different American colonies because the practice Mercantilism, which means that they wanted to keep all their wealth to themselves.
When Trades between two entity happens, both wealth of the trading partners will increase due to the profit that they generate through the trades. The Europeans do not want this to happen because they wanted to keep America powerless and under their control.</span>
Answer:
Number 1 and 2 are correct. Number 3 is "yes". Number 4 is "yes". Number 5 is "no". Number 6 is "no". Number 7 is "yes". Number 8 is "no".
Explanation:
Number one isn't fair because the juvenile wouldn't know what to say and would be confused about what's happening or going to happen because they didn't have enough time to prepare. Number 2 isn't fair because she might say something that she didn't know she was/wasn't supposed to say that the lawyer would have told her. Number 3 is fair because they aren't supposed to lie in court and the judge needs to know what happened to know how much trouble the person gets and who gets it. Number 4 is fair because since the person is underage and doesn't have enough money to buy a lawyer, the court should assign one to the juvenile. Number 5 is no because the judge or the person going against the juvenile could say something that never happened or never been said at the hearing. Number 6 is no because there's nothing against the juvenile about what happened and he/she could be innocent. Number 7 is yes because the court needs all the evidence and proof about what happened so the judge knows what to do. Number 8 is no because the parents might not be able to make it because they might forget the date of the hearing and they need writing for when the date is and where the hearing is, incase they forgot. I really hope i helped.
