Well, before you start, you need to choose a side. If you are confused on the phrasing, it is simply asking:
Do you agree that the Supreme Court should be able to think of the law differently during a case to fit with current views?
After that, start thinking of why.
Yes, they should, the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to change as societal views changed.
No, they shouldn't, just because societal views are changing, what we need for our country to run smoothly is the same as it has been,
Hope I could help!
<span>The right answer is regressive social movement. A regressive social movement occurs when people perceive that a social change that took place harms them instead of helping them, and they initiate a campaign or social movement to socialize the reasons why social changes should be reversed. <span>Generally, these movements seek to reverse and create new rules to reduce the social threat they perceive.
I hope this information can help you.
</span></span>
Most people started to get interested in art.
It allowed sates to pass right to work law
