Answer lit
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.
Answer:
Thanks so much, let me know if you need help with hw or something :)
Simplify the following:
(25/a - a l)/(a + 5)
Put each term in 25/a - a l over the common denominator a: 25/a - a l = 25/a - (a^2 l)/a:
(25/a - (a^2 l)/a)/(a + 5)
25/a - (a^2 l)/a = (25 - a^2 l)/a:
Answer: ((25 - a^2 l)/a)/(a + 5)
Answer:
A.50-n=44, 6 shorts borrowed
Step-by-step explanation:
If her sister borrowed n shorts, that means Shelly now has n less shorts. Since her amount of shorts is 50, then 50-n must equal how many shorts she has now, meaning 50-n=44. Solving the equation we get n=6. This means that her sister borrowed 6 shorts.
