False, The south generally had a superior military leadership while the north struggle to find success commanders for its armies
Answer:
Causes of WW1: Alliances.
Causes of WW1: Imperialism.
Causes of WW1: Militarism.
Causes of WW1: Nationalism.
Causes of WW1: Crises.
The Assassination of Franz Ferdinand.
There were 4 MAIN causes of World War One they were Militarism, Nationalism, Imperialism, and Alliances. Militarism is when the government will maintain a strong military capability and will be aggressive to defend from attackers. Nationalism is when people of a country will stay strong with the culture of that country.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "a transition of agriculture", since this was perhaps the most important development during the Neolithic Revolution.</span></span>
The best option in terms of the Gentleman’s Agreement of 1907 would be that "<span>The United States would not segregate Japanese immigrants, and Japan would not allow further emigration to the United States," although it had less to do with segregation and more to do with not allowing more Japanese into the US. </span>
Answer: The answer is complex and not straightforward.
Explanation:
The article relates to Churchill and Roosevelt, so is probably dated from World War 2.
Given this and the reference to the use of force by aggressive nations it is reasonable to assume that this refers to the Axis nations and their allies, primarily Germany, Japan and Italy.
What is being referred to is reflected in the policies applied to Germany and Japan at the end of World War 2. (Italy had already switched sides and deposed Mussolini).
In the post war agreements drawn up, Germany and Japan were largely demilitarised with strict control over their armed forces. In the case of West Germany their limited armed forces existed only within the context of NATO to prevent any aggressive use as was evidenced at the beginning of World War 2.
In both instances these countries were not allowed to develop or possess nuclear weapons.
Until such time as there is a global disarmament treaty, as referred to in the article, then countries which are deemed "aggressive", the losers in a conflict, by others, the winners, have arms controls imposed.
Of course this does not and has not stopped the proliferation of weapons, and conflicts throughout the world since 1945, including the aggressive policies of countries such as the UK and the USA.
