American foreign policy, and any country that has a foreign policy for that matter, must always be aware of the economic tendencies that are happening all over the world. Economic hardships in one country are sure to have a domino effect on others and create a worldwide economic struggle, thus, America having the need to change direction in foreign policies if needed.
Answer:
reactive
Explanation:
Societies who made reactive change only make it in order to adapt Rather than do it for a certain cause or principles.
In the example above, BP's already know that their method of over exploitation could possess a risk for oil spilling, and yet they did not make the necessary effort to prevent it.
After the explosion occurred and the spilled oil damaged the nearby environment, BP decided to make a change by containing surface oil and Utilizing chemical oil dispersal to separate the oil that is spilled underwater.
BP made the change in reaction after the accident occured, not before. Which is why we consider this as a reactive change.
According to Philip R.Shaver, there are three "behavioral systems" that play a role in romantic love: attachment, caregiving and sexual attraction.
You view love as an attachment when you are emotionally dependent on the other person for your happiness, safety and security, while love as caregiving refers to the great pleasure you receive from supporting, caring for and taking of a loved one.
Lastly, love as a sexual attraction is when you can't get the other person out of your mind and the thought of him or her excites you and turns you on.
If we will based the statement above from Shaver's model, we can say that the love being felt by John and Cynthia for each other transcends from attachment love to caregiving love.
Yes, this is correct.
Crucially, this is only the case if everything else stays equal: so if the quality of the product stays the same and if the income of the buyers doesn't decrease.
Then with a lower prize, more items will be purchased - and less if the prize increases.